Recently, a project had an unpleasant experience with its token sale plan and directly apologized by admitting defeat. Where did the problem lie? Simply put, the sales logic was never designed with a proper balance between retail investors and whales in mind. As a result, no matter how attractive the design was, no one really wanted to participate, and engagement remained low.



The project team later decided to make a major adjustment. First, they removed the previous cap of $2,500 per account, allowing users to decide for themselves how much to invest—invest as much as they want. Second, they shifted from a purely random distribution model to a new allocation logic.

The core goal of this adjustment is actually summarized in one sentence: how to make retail investors, whales, and the entire mechanism more comfortable. It seems the project team also realized that unreasonable restrictions can hurt popularity, while loosening them might lead to a healthier environment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastervip
· 01-08 13:24
honestly removing caps is just the bare minimum... but removing random allocation? now we're talking. finally someone realized their tokenomics gave worse odds than my failed txs at 2am during network congestion lmao
Reply0
GasDevourervip
· 01-08 07:56
Haha, this is genuine. No more pretending, just directly breaking the ceiling, and the whales are overjoyed. The project team has finally figured it out. Being too restrictive only drives people away. I think this round of adjustments is good. Only by loosening up can the ecosystem survive. It's another project that has learned to be human, making progress. To put it simply, they were overcomplicating things before. Simplicity and brutality are the most effective. This approach should have been launched earlier; all the fuss was unnecessary. But I'm a bit worried that after opening up, the price might get hammered...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 01-05 14:43
This time, I guess I learned my lesson. Lifting restrictions can actually save the situation.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRektvip
· 01-05 14:28
Lifting restrictions has actually revived it, indicating that the previous approach was indeed wrong.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 01-05 14:20
Wait, removing the $2,500 cap? It depends on how the new allocation logic is designed... Will the liquidity depth be directly eaten up by whales?
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-05 14:15
Ha, another project that removes the cap. This time, they’ve learned their lesson... Whales can finally breathe, and retail investors no longer have to be restricted by the ceiling. To put it nicely, it’s called "flexibility"; to be blunt, the previous system was purely just empty talk. The real question is whether the new allocation logic is reliable. No one knows what the random allocation has been changed to, and it feels like they’re about to screw over some people again.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt