A research institution recently released an outlook for the crypto market in 2026, which includes an interesting perspective: the traditional "four-year cycle" may be becoming obsolete.



Why? The report provides three key reasons. First, the demand side has changed—new sources of funding and new application scenarios are constantly emerging. Second, the macro environment is favorable, with the overall economic climate being relatively friendly to crypto assets. Third, and very importantly, regulatory attitudes are continuously improving, and this has a significant positive impact on market confidence.

From a macro perspective, the market is currently digesting the expectation that the Federal Reserve may further ease monetary policy. What does this mean for assets like BTC? Historical experience shows that an environment with ample liquidity is usually beneficial for digital assets. So the question becomes—how far can this cycle go? Has the traditional cycle theory really become invalid? It’s worth ongoing attention.
BTC-0,43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DuckFluffvip
· 15h ago
Four-year cycle invalid? I think it's just that there are too many new retail investors, haha. Cycles never die; they are just evolving. Sounds nice, but it still depends on the Federal Reserve's mood. Liquidity is abundant and can cause a surge? Then why am I still losing? Regulatory improvements + loose policies, I have some doubts about this combination. How far it can go is really hard to say; it still depends on how institutions harvest. This round will be different, but if you ask me how it's different, I also don't know. Those who make money are never in research reports.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteranvip
· 01-07 14:05
Four-year cycle invalid? Haha, I heard that back in 2018, and you all know the result... I've heard too many times that this time is different, but maybe I should first put away the sickle in the leek field.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingersvip
· 01-06 15:55
Four-year cycle invalid? I don't believe it; history will repeat itself.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 01-06 15:54
Four-year cycle invalid? I think it's just new rookies coming in again. Every bull market cycle, someone says this time is different, haha. Regulatory friendly, ample liquidity... just listen to that. When the bear market hits, it still drops.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 01-06 15:49
Four-year cycle invalid? Stop joking. We hear this claim every bull market. Wait, I agree that abundant liquidity is beneficial for BTC, but has the source of new funds really changed? Isn't it still those same institutions cutting retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokesvip
· 01-06 15:36
Four-year cycle invalid? Just listen to it. The next bear market can still make people doubt life.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)