In Space, many people mistakenly believe they are betting on the outcome of a certain event.

Actually, that's not the case.

What you're truly participating in is a game of judgment about others:
Will they believe it?
When will they start to waver?
Will the consensus collapse instantly or gradually shift?

Events are just triggers.
Price never reflects the facts themselves, but rather the group's expected change in perception speed.
This is also why trading in Space is completely different from traditional "betting on right or wrong" methods.

You don't need to wait for a conclusion; just keep an eye on a single curve — observe how expectations form, spread, overheat, hesitate, and then get corrected.
@intodotspace's work essentially makes this curve explicit.

It won't tell you "whether to buy or not," but will lay bare the moments when emotions cluster and judgment diverges, exposing these dense areas directly in front of you.
Panic never arrives suddenly, and consensus isn't reached overnight.
They all have precursors, but most platforms choose to ignore them.

The design logic of Space is more like a macro trading approach:
You should focus not on a single variable, but on how collective cognition drifts over time.

When the speed of expectation change outpaces price reactions, opportunities arise;
When emotions have been fully digested by the price, even major "events" become irrelevant decorations.
@cookiedotfun @MindoAI