On Warden Protocol, the fact that agents can make mistakes isn't seen as a flaw in the system design. Here's why: these agents function differently than most imagine. They're not positioned as infallible bots programmed to deliver the perfect answer every time. Instead, they operate as a thinking layer—one that ingests multiple data signals, processes competing information, and surfaces different potential scenarios for consideration. The real job isn't to decide for you but to think through the possibilities and present what the data reveals.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityLarry
· 10h ago
NGL, this is the right way. Agents are not here to make decisions for you; they're just thinking partners, sharing data openly with you... This design is indeed comfortable.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 15h ago
Oh, that's right. When agents make mistakes, it's not a bug; it's a feature.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-07 10:15
Ha, this is the correct way to open it. An agent shouldn't be a god; being able to make mistakes actually shows that it is thinking genuinely rather than making things up.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 01-06 19:50
ngl, this idea is quite interesting. When the agent makes a mistake, it becomes a feature rather than a bug, saving us from blindly trusting the decision of a single model.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 01-06 19:50
Haha, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. AI is not here to make decisions for you; it's just a thinking tool.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-06 19:47
To be honest, I quite agree with this approach. Agent errors are not really an issue; the key is that it can help you see through the logic behind the data.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-06 19:42
ngl, this idea is indeed interesting. An agent error being a feature rather than a bug? It feels like finding a reason to dig your own pit and pave a way out...
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 01-06 19:39
Haha, that's right. When agents make mistakes, it's not a bug, it's a feature. What's truly interesting is the thinking process itself, not necessarily giving you a standard answer.
On Warden Protocol, the fact that agents can make mistakes isn't seen as a flaw in the system design. Here's why: these agents function differently than most imagine. They're not positioned as infallible bots programmed to deliver the perfect answer every time. Instead, they operate as a thinking layer—one that ingests multiple data signals, processes competing information, and surfaces different potential scenarios for consideration. The real job isn't to decide for you but to think through the possibilities and present what the data reveals.