[BitPush] Reuters, citing customs data, outlined an interesting phenomenon: between 2013 and 2016, a South American country shipped 113 metric tons of gold to Switzerland, worth approximately 4.14 billion Swiss francs (equivalent to $5.2 billion). This batch of gold came from the country’s central bank — at that time, the government was actively selling off gold assets to sustain the economy.
But starting in 2017, the story took a turn. After the EU sanctions were implemented, such gold exports completely stopped. Data shows that from 2017 to 2025, this country has not exported any gold to Switzerland.
This case is worth pondering: gold, as the hardest asset, was once the last resort for the country’s central bank to support its economy. But sanctions changed the rules of the game — even with gold in hand, without smooth international trade channels, assets lose liquidity. This provides a real-world reference for understanding national asset allocation strategies, the deep impact of sanctions on the economy, and the constraints on global capital flows.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
unrekt.eth
· 01-07 19:07
Gold has also been frozen? That's just ridiculous. No matter how solid the assets are, there has to be a way to move them.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-06 20:48
Absolutely incredible, having gold is useless... Once sanctions are imposed, assets turn into worthless paper, liquidity instantly evaporates. That's the real killer move.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 01-06 20:25
Gold has also been frozen? This is the real severity of the sanctions—having assets but no way to access them is the same as having none.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-06 20:20
Gold is locked down, this is the real killer move of sanctions... Having money is useless; someone has to receive it.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 01-06 20:18
Holding gold is useless; without a way to go overseas, it's just a brick... Sanctions have truly redefined the meaning of "assets."
How sanctions have changed national asset reserve strategies based on gold flows
[BitPush] Reuters, citing customs data, outlined an interesting phenomenon: between 2013 and 2016, a South American country shipped 113 metric tons of gold to Switzerland, worth approximately 4.14 billion Swiss francs (equivalent to $5.2 billion). This batch of gold came from the country’s central bank — at that time, the government was actively selling off gold assets to sustain the economy.
But starting in 2017, the story took a turn. After the EU sanctions were implemented, such gold exports completely stopped. Data shows that from 2017 to 2025, this country has not exported any gold to Switzerland.
This case is worth pondering: gold, as the hardest asset, was once the last resort for the country’s central bank to support its economy. But sanctions changed the rules of the game — even with gold in hand, without smooth international trade channels, assets lose liquidity. This provides a real-world reference for understanding national asset allocation strategies, the deep impact of sanctions on the economy, and the constraints on global capital flows.