2026-01-07 06:23:03

Many beginners ask me the most: How can I turn a small amount of money into big profits? I’ve decided to organize my real trading experience over the past three months, and the core is actually two words—Focus and Compound Interest.

Let me share my trading framework. Taking $100,000 USD as an example, divide it into 5-6 parts, and only trade with one part at a time. The obvious benefit of this approach is that each loss provides multiple opportunities for trial and error, and you will never be eliminated by a single market wave. It also keeps your mindset much more comfortable.

How exactly do I operate? The first step is spot market positioning. Choose one or two mainstream coins to hold steadily, avoid chasing highs or making reckless moves. Then wait for the coin price to pull back; when the decline reaches about 10%, add to your position in batches to lower your average cost. Conversely, when the price rises, sell one portion every 10% increase to realize arbitrage. This cycle repeats, and each operation can lock in about 10% profit.

In my opinion, rather than wasting energy guessing whether prices will go up or down, it’s better to master the rhythm. For highly volatile coins, switch to stable top-tier coins, which have higher trading efficiency. Don’t let idle funds sit idle—many platforms offer financial products, and putting money into them to earn some interest is also a good idea. Even if the market drops by 50%, this batch-by-batch strategy can protect your principal from panic.

The most critical factor is actually execution. You don’t need genius-level prediction skills; just consistently apply a good strategy, let compound interest accumulate slowly, and small funds can gradually grow into a large sum. I only do real trading, not virtual numbers. If you want to make money steadily, you might want to try this approach.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotFinancialAdvice

· 01-10 03:51

Sounds good, but the execution difficulty is a bit high. The strategy of incremental replenishment is indeed reliable, but the problem is that few people can truly stick to it. Making money has never been a secret; it's just that no one can endure it. I agree with this logic, but can the mindset really stay stable when there's a 50% fluctuation? The difference between real trading and armchair strategizing is huge; I admire that.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-09 04:57

The batch strategy is indeed stable, but it requires strong discipline. Most people can't endure until the power of compound interest takes effect. It looks simple, but in practice, you really need to control the urge to chase the high. The hardest part in the crypto world is not choosing the right coin, but sticking to it. A 10% pace sounds slow, but after a few months of rolling, you can really see the results. The problem is, how many people can hold on? Using the batch replenishment method is very helpful for maintaining the right mindset, preventing a single mistake from being a total loss. Compared to predictions from big influencers, this rigid pace actually makes more money—ironic, isn't it? Holding spot assets and earning passively is much more comfortable than constantly watching the market and analyzing 5-minute charts.

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 01-07 06:48

Sounds good, but if this logic could truly reliably generate 10%, I would have been a millionaire long ago. Batching additional purchases is reliable; I'm just worried about losing composure during execution. It's easy to say, but when actually trading, large fluctuations can throw everything into chaos. The 10% pace sounds beautiful, but how many can truly sustain and replicate it? Ultimately, you still need to withstand the psychological pressure when the market crashes down. I agree with this logic; the market is always crazier than you think.

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 01-07 06:47

This batch-by-batch approach is indeed stable, but execution is too difficult. Selling 10% each time? You must have a very strong mindset. The idea of diversifying risk makes sense, but only if you can truly stick to it. Easy to say, but in practice, it's full of dilemmas.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-07 06:27

This way of thinking sounds comfortable, but how does it actually work in practice? I've tried the method of incremental replenishment, but the problem is you'll never know where the bottom is. Can your mindset hold up? It's easy to say, but the actual implementation is another matter altogether.

View OriginalReply0

TokenEconomist

· 01-07 06:25

actually, the mathematical framework here is a bit misleading... let me break this down. you're talking about a 10% per cycle return, but that's only sustainable if market conditions remain static, which they obviously don't. the key variable here is volatility—ceteris paribus, lower volatility means tighter spreads and compounding friction.

Reply0