The recent rally in the buyback wave looked quite fierce, but it disappeared just as quickly—over the past two weeks, altcoin rebounds have been in a state of shrinking volume. Since the spike in mid-October, the market signals have been very clear: funds have bottomed out and there’s no strength left to push prices higher.



Take a governance token from a leading DEX as an example. As an established liquidity protocol, there hasn’t been any significant innovation in recent years. Relying solely on project buybacks to boost the price? That’s not very realistic. The accumulated trapped positions are stacked high, and there’s no new capital continuously flowing in to replenish the market—ultimately, it turns into internal fund shuffling. The project team has to spend huge costs just to support the price, which is not cost-effective.

However, from a different perspective—if your strategy is to do medium- to long-term dollar-cost averaging, these kinds of tokens can still be considered. The reasons are simple: they are relatively resilient to declines, have a sound revenue model, and are supported by solid positive cash flow. Projects like $UNI have a strong fundamental base.

Overall judgment: the probability of a quick surge in the short term is low, as there aren’t many bullets left. But if you can withstand the volatility, use dollar-cost averaging to lower your average cost, the medium- to long-term return prospects are still more stable.
UNI-1,23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterXvip
· 01-10 07:20
The rebound with decreasing volume is a joke; the funds have long been gone. --- It's the same old trick of buyback pallets; coins like UNI really have nothing new. --- Dollar-cost averaging? I don't believe it. Let's wait and see. --- So many trapped positions, who dares to enter? Better to stay on the sidelines. --- Old projects without innovation, relying solely on cash flow? That's nonsense. --- This round of market really has no ammunition; it's just a false fire. --- Relatively resisting declines sounds good, but in practice, it’s exhausting. --- The internal trading costs are so high; the project team is also quite miserable. --- No hope in the short term; if I do dollar-cost averaging, I’ll wait and consider again. --- If new money doesn't come in, this market will die.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyervip
· 01-09 19:05
A volume-reducing rebound is just squeezing out the water; don't be fooled by buybacks. --- Old projects like UNI are indeed resistant to declines, but innovation? That's a different story. --- Dollar-cost averaging sounds good, but I'm afraid it might end up hitting the floor. --- Who ends up paying for the costs the project team spends to support the price? --- Without new funds to replenish, this is a dead cycle. --- Short-term surges are unlikely; long-term dollar-cost averaging is the right approach. Just hold through the retracements. --- This volume-reducing rebound is purely a bluff; the funds have already withdrawn. --- Old DEXs can only rely on buybacks if they lack innovation, but how long can buybacks sustain? --- So many trapped investors still want a quick surge—what are they thinking? --- Positive cash flow support sounds solid, but it requires liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434vip
· 01-07 07:50
The pattern of volume rebound is seen too often, the signal lights for a bear trap are already on. The phrase "funds are at the bottom" sounds comforting, but in reality, it just means no one is willing to take over. What does UNI rely on to pump? No innovation, just waiting for buybacks? Dream on. Dollar-cost averaging sounds rational, but as soon as the market drops, you all run away quickly. With such heavy trapped positions, why believe it can turn around? Old projects = outdated, are people still chasing this? Instead of dollar-cost averaging, it's better to wait for real bottom signals before acting. Now jumping in just to get caught.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnervip
· 01-07 07:50
Volume-down rebound? That means no one is following, and I believe the funds have bottomed out. Old coins like UNI are okay to put in a fixed investment basket, at least they have cash flow to support them, making them more reliable than those worthless coins. Short-term hard push? Don't even think about it, the ammunition is indeed insufficient.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgainvip
· 01-07 07:44
According to the database, the popularity of this buyback has become historical data — another two weeks have passed since the last commitment to fund bottoming out. The hype cycle for old projects like $UNI is indeed very stable; I suggest they be included in the Guinness World Records.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfervip
· 01-07 07:40
The pattern of a volume-constrained rebound is something I've seen many times; buybacks and pump-ups often end up being just self-entertainment. Dollar-cost averaging into UNI is indeed effective, but you need patience to hold on stubbornly. There's no short-term hope; the long-term is the real way to go. With so many trapped positions, no one can save them; only time can wear them down.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)