Bill Ackman pushes back against Trump's recent proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year, calling it economically flawed. Here's the crux of his argument: if lenders can't charge rates high enough to offset defaults and maintain healthy returns on equity, they'll simply exit the market. It's not about greed—it's basic math. When you artificially suppress rates below what covers actual risk and capital requirements, card issuers face a choice: take losses or stop issuing cards entirely. The second option is what happens in practice. Consumers expecting easier credit access could actually face the opposite—reduced availability, stricter approval standards, or higher fees on other products to compensate. This kind of price control typically backfires by reducing supply rather than making credit more affordable. The lending ecosystem depends on risk-appropriate pricing. Force that pricing down artificially, and you shrink credit availability precisely when people need it most.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoMomvip
· 01-10 07:23
Here comes the same old policy regulation approach: controlling interest rates to force banks to delist. When that happens, there will be nowhere to borrow money. This logic really makes no sense.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 01-10 03:35
Haha, Ackman is right on this one. Limit orders still end up hurting retail investors the most. It's like the market maker is forced to cut losses, and in the end, the retail investors don't get a bargain but get trapped. When credit card interest rates are suppressed, banks simply withdraw from the market. And what’s the result? The threshold only gets higher, and fees keep changing in various ways. Basically, it's basic economics, brother. If you forcibly lower prices, the supply side disappears altogether. In the end, it's the ordinary people who get hurt. Don't be fooled by policies. --- In simple terms, it's just a new excuse to cut the leeks, claiming to benefit the people while actually undermining the foundation. --- Risk control really can't be handled recklessly. Once the bad debt rate rises, banks will run away, and the credit market will collapse directly. Even Bitcoin can't save you. --- This logic is sound, but politicians will never listen. They will still try to intervene in the market, causing chaos.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardianvip
· 01-10 03:34
Another piece of crappy policy regulation... Ackman is right, the 10% interest rate cap is forcing banks to run away, and when no one issues cards, that's the real problem.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingToReadDocsvip
· 01-10 03:32
Huh? Limiting to a 10% interest rate operation... Ackman is right, it's the banks withdrawing from the market that really harms consumers.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 01-10 03:27
Ah... Ackman is right, government orders to control interest rates are really just wishful thinking. If that happens, no one will issue cards, and it will be even worse.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 01-10 03:19
Here comes the usual trick on consumers again. Limiting interest rates ultimately harms ordinary people, while banks just run away and it's over.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher1vip
· 01-10 03:16
Restricting interest rates is just a fancy way of saying drinking poison to quench thirst. Once banks can't make money, they'll just pack up and leave. In the end, it's still us ordinary people who end up with no cards to use.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)