2026-01-16 14:39:30

Sentient's tokenomics plan has been released, with community allocation reaching 44%. Overall, this ratio is quite good.

The initial airdrop amount is approximately 13% of the total circulating supply, which is already a fairly generous allocation from a data perspective. This level of airdrop is considered mainstream among similar projects.

What's even more interesting is the market's expectations for this project. According to market feedback from a certain prediction platform, on the second day after Sentient's launch, the probability of the FDV surpassing $200 million has been marked at 99%. Looking further, the probability of reaching $400 million is 87%, and even hitting $600 million has an 83% chance of being viewed positively. These numbers reflect a high level of market enthusiasm for the project. Of course, prediction platforms are just references; the actual trend still depends on real market feedback.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredWatcher

· 01-19 01:08

44% community allocation? Not bad, as long as I look at the airdrop ratio, is 13% enough to be generous? $200 million with a 99% probability... emm, the numbers on the prediction platform are a bit floating, I can't really buy into it. We'll see the truth at the secondary level; no matter how loud the hype, it's all talk.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-18 20:37

44% community allocation? Not bad, not bad. At least it's not the typical VC vampire squeezing retail investors. Wait, 99% chance of hitting 200 million? The prediction platform is so confident. I feel a bit skeptical. 13% airdrop seems generous, but you won't know the actual situation until it’s really listed. Whether this is reliable or not depends on the real market performance. Predictions are just predictions, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 01-16 15:06

Wow, 44% community share? I have to admit, this ratio is quite acceptable, unlike some projects that are just outrageous. However, there's a 99% chance it will break 200 million... The prediction platform is hyping it up, so I don't really believe it. Just listen and don't take it seriously. A 13% airdrop allocation is not bad, it's somewhat sincere.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-16 15:06

44% community allocation is pretty good, 13% airdrop is also generous, let's see if it can really break 200 million on the second day.

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 01-16 15:06

44% community allocation isn't bad, but it still feels somewhat conservative compared to those top-tier projects... Airdrop 13% sounds quite generous, but in reality, it's nothing special as it's been common in the market for a while. I don't believe the 99% prediction platform; it's all fake. There are many projects that dump on the second day after launch.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-16 15:02

44% community allocation ratio? The fuel configuration for this launch window is indeed quite meticulous. According to the RSI indicator, it has already entered the hot zone. 13% airdrop strength is a mainstream standard, but the key is whether the real buying pressure after listing can break through the atmosphere. The 99% probability of this statement... prediction platforms are just for entertainment; real market feedback is the true escape velocity. $200 million breaking the support on the second day? Based on Bollinger Bands analysis, this angle coefficient likely requires a substantial and sustained buying force to maintain, otherwise it’s just an illusionary trajectory. Probability of $600 million reaching 83%? Bro, these numbers are a bit overhyped. Be careful of a gravity pull-back crashing down.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-16 14:50

44% community allocation + 13% airdrop, this setup is indeed comfortable, but with a 99% probability on the prediction platform... Bro, I don't really believe it; theoretical data will never outweigh market sentiment.

View OriginalReply0