2026-01-17 15:28:35

I recently saw the Sentient AI project launch on a major wallet platform for new token offerings, and the tokenomics announced at the same time have attracted a lot of attention. The 2% public offering ratio has become a focal point of discussion, and I think this design is quite rational.

From the token distribution perspective, it clearly shows the project's emphasis on the community. Of the total $SENT supply, 65.55% is allocated for community-related purposes, which is relatively rare among similar projects. Among this, 44% is dedicated to community incentives and airdrops. This design indicates that the project team is not aiming for quick profit extraction but rather wants to promote ecosystem development through community building.

In today's mixed landscape of AI projects, this approach of prioritizing community interests indeed appears conscientious. The rationality of tokenomics directly impacts the project's long-term growth potential, and SENT's plan, from its distribution structure to its incentive mechanisms, reveals a certain level of professionalism.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 8h ago

Wow, 65.55% community share? That number really surprised me. It's rare to see such generosity in similar projects.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 16h ago

65% community share sounds good, but can this number be realized? I always feel that project teams say nice things, but in the end, it still depends on whether it can truly be reflected in our hands.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 16h ago

A 65% community allocation is indeed rare, but is it true that so much of the proportion is invested in community incentives... Really? --- A 2% public offering is a bit aggressive, but on the other hand, this economic design is indeed more reliable than those gas-cutting schemes. --- Community incentives account for 44%? Wait, this number needs to be verified. --- It's rare to see project teams not rushing to cash out quickly. SENT's approach is quite fresh. --- Just looking at the attractive distribution ratio, the key is to see how the subsequent execution will be. --- Among these AI projects, those that are not deceptive are truly considered conscientious, but I will wait and see. --- A public offering ratio this low might actually cause early circulation to be tight? Would like to hear everyone's thoughts. --- Another project that says "We care about the community," alright, let's get on board first. --- The token model is well designed, just worried about the subsequent airdrops being diluted.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole