The regulatory attitude of the current chairman of Australia's financial regulatory agency ASIC during his tenure has become a hot topic of discussion. Reports indicate that over the past five years, ASIC has adopted a relatively strict regulatory approach, which has put considerable pressure on innovative financial sectors, including the cryptocurrency industry. As this chairman is about to step down, the market has begun to speculate whether ASIC's regulatory policies will undergo adjustments.
Interestingly, in recent years, many Australian crypto companies have actively embraced compliance frameworks, attempting to operate within regulatory boundaries. But what has been the result? They have instead faced lawsuits from ASIC. This has indeed sparked industry reflection: why do legal disputes still occur when companies proactively cooperate with regulatory requirements?
From an industry perspective, Australia's crypto ecosystem needs a clear and predictable regulatory environment. The current situation seems to cause confusion among compliant companies, which may be a key issue for the next regulatory leadership to reconsider. How the new leadership will balance innovation and risk prevention remains a topic of ongoing attention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusBot
· 9h ago
Ha... Things here in Australia are really outrageous. No matter how well we cooperate, it's all in vain.
Actively sending money to comply with regulations has been sued, and I really can't understand this logic.
Let's wait for the new chairman to take over. Can they be a bit less capricious?
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 9h ago
Getting sued even after compliance? That's just ridiculous haha. I really can't understand the tricks in Australia more and more.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 9h ago
Everyone's being sued for compliance, this regulation is really 🤮, might as well just lie flat.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 9h ago
Rolling up and still being sued, is this Australia's charisma?🤷
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 9h ago
Getting sued even after compliance? Laughable, this must be Australia's way of "welcoming" newcomers.
---
ASIC's actions are truly outrageous; companies cooperate obediently, yet still can't avoid trouble.
---
Hope the new chairman won't cause more trouble. Just give clear rules so everyone can play properly.
---
Why does the regulatory authority in Australia always seem to be confused about what compliance really means?
---
Honestly, it's still a rules problem. Who would dare to build projects in Australia under current conditions?
---
In recent years, Australian crypto companies have had a really tough time; compliance costs alone can drain them dry.
---
Changing the chairman is useless; systemic issues remain unresolved, still the same old story.
The regulatory attitude of the current chairman of Australia's financial regulatory agency ASIC during his tenure has become a hot topic of discussion. Reports indicate that over the past five years, ASIC has adopted a relatively strict regulatory approach, which has put considerable pressure on innovative financial sectors, including the cryptocurrency industry. As this chairman is about to step down, the market has begun to speculate whether ASIC's regulatory policies will undergo adjustments.
Interestingly, in recent years, many Australian crypto companies have actively embraced compliance frameworks, attempting to operate within regulatory boundaries. But what has been the result? They have instead faced lawsuits from ASIC. This has indeed sparked industry reflection: why do legal disputes still occur when companies proactively cooperate with regulatory requirements?
From an industry perspective, Australia's crypto ecosystem needs a clear and predictable regulatory environment. The current situation seems to cause confusion among compliant companies, which may be a key issue for the next regulatory leadership to reconsider. How the new leadership will balance innovation and risk prevention remains a topic of ongoing attention.