Historically, whenever Q4 experiences a downward trend, Q1 often sees a rebound. This pattern has been quite stable and has never been broken. Based on past data, this seasonal transition pattern is quite reliable. Friends looking to catch the bottom can consider this cyclical characteristic — although it can't guarantee success every time, in the long run, it is indeed a noteworthy trading window.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMuskRatvip
· 5h ago
Wait a minute, has this pattern really never been broken? It seems like every time someone talks about historical patterns, they end up getting brutally hit by reality.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphetvip
· 5h ago
Bro, I've heard this explanation too many times. Every time they say the pattern is stable, but what happens then?
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 5h ago
I've heard the quarterly cycle theory so many times, but it still ends up being proven wrong.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalkervip
· 5h ago
Can you really trust the concept of historical patterns? Why do I always seem to catch the moment when they are broken?
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 5h ago
Sounds good, but I remember that there was no rebound in Q1 last year either.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriservip
· 5h ago
Even in a bear market, you can still see the sunrise. That's always been the pattern, but can we believe it this year?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)