The $GAS narrative provided solid momentum while it lasted—there's really no need to scapegoat the core team for its inevitable pullback. Projects like this come around rarely; getting caught in genuine upside before the pivot is legitimately fortunate, even if the outcome stings now.

That said, the real issue surfaces when you trace the economics. A dev team that captured $300k in gains while the broader community took the losses? That's where accountability matters. It's less about whether they promoted something interesting at the time, and more about how the incentives actually played out when the rubber hit the road. The timing and execution of exits always tells you something about where true conviction lived.