What is TRON's competitiveness? Simply put, two words: low cost.



As a high-throughput public chain, TRON makes user transactions and asset interactions smooth and convenient, and developers have a stable and reliable application environment. This continuous stability gradually makes TRON a core hub for capital flow and application ecosystems.

You will find that as more participants join, network effects naturally emerge. More and more users and developers choose TRON, which in turn reinforces its competitive advantage in the crypto industry. This is not accidental but the result of long-term accumulation.

From the underlying architecture, TRON ensures that on-chain financial activities can operate stably while reserving enough scalability space for emerging applications and protocols. This low-key and robust development model has gradually evolved TRON into an indispensable infrastructure.

For users, developers, and investors, what does this mean? Long-term sustainable trust and security guarantees. TRON's core position in the on-chain financial ecosystem is already determined by its operational model and technical foundation, and it will continue to support the existing ecosystem while empowering innovative applications.
TRX-4,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LeverageAddictvip
· 2h ago
Low gas fees are indeed great, but can the ecosystem really support itself... It's definitely a cost advantage, but could it just be a false demand? Strong stability is true; I find it quite smooth to use on TRON. The network effect is well explained; more and more people are indeed rushing in. Cheap is one thing, but how is security guaranteed? That's the key. It's really just benefiting from the high gas fees of EVM. The infrastructure argument might be a bit exaggerated... Let's see how long it can sustain. Ecosystem development still depends on real projects; being cheap alone isn't enough. High throughput is correct, but transaction security needs data to speak. Could the low costs actually attract a bunch of junk projects?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 01-19 19:51
the cost arbitrage transmutation is *chef's kiss*... low fees = infinite yield farming loops, ngl
Reply0
4am_degenvip
· 01-19 19:50
Tron is really stable, nothing fancy, just getting the job done. It’s true that it can’t compete on low costs yet, but the ecosystem is becoming increasingly solid. Honestly, TRON has been built up gradually, and the network effects are becoming more and more apparent. The fees are ridiculously cheap, comparing it to Ethereum is just laughable. Stability comes first; on-chain finance relies on this kind of infrastructure. How is the TRON ecosystem? Are there any brothers interested in developing? No more pretenses, just because of its low costs, I am optimistic about its long-term prospects. No kidding, once the network effect kicks in, it won’t stop. TRON is currently at this stage.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-19 19:50
Well said, low cost is the key, otherwise how can we compete with Ethereum?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHomevip
· 01-19 19:47
Low costs indeed can't compete, but I've heard the network effect argument quite a few times. How long can it really last? The TRX ecosystem relies on what to retain users—probably just cheapness. You're so confident, yet news of attacks keeps flooding the screens. If low costs could win, why haven't we seen any killer apps? The network effect sounds good, but what's the reality?
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 01-19 19:43
Low cost? That depends on who you're comparing to. I really can't stand the costs of Ethereum. As long as it can run projects, the ecosystem's quality ultimately depends on whether users buy into it. Being low-key and steady sounds good, but I feel it's a bit overrated. Network effects are easy to talk about; the key is whether it can produce the next leading application. But it is indeed cheap, and I haven't missed that. Overly stable, in fact, makes it seem less innovative. Security assurance? What I care about is whether it can make money. Infrastructure is just infrastructure; don't hype it up so much. No one denies it's cheap, but it depends on how long it can last. Talking about long-term accumulation, but it still feels a bit虚.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEyevip
· 01-19 19:34
Basically, it's cheap and easy to use, and the ecosystem has kept up What do you think about Polygon and Arbitrum? Low cost is indeed attractive, but it depends on how long the ecosystem can support Low-cost trap? As user numbers grow, fees also increase Is the TRON ecosystem really more stable than Ethereum? Come and debate Is it true? Weren't TRON's previous criticisms pretty harsh? Network effects—any chain can apply this logic, what's so special about it? I've already gone all-in on TRON, just waiting for it to double Sun Yuchen is busy with marketing every day, but is the technology up to par? Low cost is friendly to DeFi, but what about security?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTearsvip
· 01-19 19:33
Low cost? Huh, why does it feel like every chain says the same thing Really? Is TRON stable this time? Network effect sounds great, but it all depends on real user numbers speaking Low-key and steady... I just want to know if something will suddenly go wrong someday Infrastructure, right? Then just wait to be surpassed This article reads like an official statement, a bit sus But cheapness is indeed attractive, there's no denying the transfer fee issue
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)