A question has been bothering me for a long time—what exactly is a certain stablecoin public chain project doing?



Since I started paying attention to it on a major exchange, the activity has never stopped. A variety of incentive programs keep coming one after another, and honestly, the frequency is a bit outrageous. But what’s the result? The token has plummeted from $1.60 in September last year to $0.13 now, a decline of over 90%.

There is a contradiction here: the project was able to rise to $1.60 in the early days, indicating that the community’s confidence was quite high and there was some consensus. So why, despite more frequent activities now, is the token price getting worse? Is the project team trying to lure retail investors by crazy reward distributions, or are they adopting internet-like tactics—spending money to capture market share first, then expanding applications and considering financial metrics later?

Objectively speaking, the design concept of this chain is quite interesting. Centered around stablecoins, its main selling point is USDT transfers with zero Gas fees. Through the Paymaster mechanism, users don’t need to hold project tokens or other volatile assets at all; they can pay directly with stablecoins or use the service completely free, which is a real pain point for ordinary users.

From an application perspective, the logic holds up. It’s been revealed that the project intends to launch a global debit card service by 2026, covering most countries. If this plan materializes, it could indeed open up a lot of possibilities.

But right now, the token price really tests people’s mental resilience. Those who hold on are betting on the application landing moment, while those who sell are worn down by the bear market and frequent activities, losing confidence. Both sides have their own logic.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_guzzlervip
· 17h ago
A typical strategy of throwing money to grab the market first; let's see if the pie in 2026 can actually be eaten.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 17h ago
A typical toothpaste-squeezing project, holding activities every day but no real progress
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 17h ago
Typical crypto industry tricks, throwing money and events to save the coin price? Should have realized this long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirlvip
· 17h ago
A 90% decline? Only projects with extremely reckless teams could make the price worse as the events become more frequent... Based on my analysis, this is a typical "raise money first, then talk" script. Honestly, on-chain data doesn't lie. We need to dig into what the big players have been doing lately. If they are still hoarding this stuff, there might still be hope. The debit card in 2026... emm, whether it will be PayPal or this one, I’m not sure at this point. If it were up to me, I’d rather watch it die than have my mindset worn down by such frequent activities.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failurevip
· 17h ago
Hey, isn't it the case that the more frequent the activities, the more the price drops? This logic has a problem, right? People betting on the 2026 debit card are really bold. Let's see if they survive until that day.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt