When it comes to blockchain, many people get stuck on this dead end—either complete transparency or total privacy, and it seems there’s no third way. Transparency scares off financial institutions, while privacy angers regulators. The Dusk project happens to approach this problem from the opposite direction.
This is not a generic chain that tries to do everything. From the very beginning, Dusk has been clear about its mission: to build foundational infrastructure for the regulated financial world. The key is that it doesn’t treat privacy and compliance as two opposing concepts; instead, from the moment of its underlying architecture, it integrates both seamlessly.
The traditional approach is to first build the system and then attach compliance labels on top. Dusk’s approach is completely reversed—imagine a confidential channel with built-in checkpoints, where data in transit can hide details and protect trade secrets, yet still provide regulators with tamper-proof proofs. This is achieved using cutting-edge cryptographic tools like zero-knowledge proofs, but the real genius lies in the design of "selective disclosure." Sensitive parts of a transaction can be locked, while the parts that need verification are revealed.
What does this mean? Banks and asset management firms can conduct private transactions or issue assets on-chain, meeting audit and compliance requirements without any awkwardness. For those traditional players who have been watching blockchain from the sidelines, this instantly removes both psychological and technical barriers.
The ecosystem is also steadily advancing. The DuskEVM mainnet is already running, lowering the barrier for developers. More convincingly, it has partnered with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX—this is not just a proof of concept, but real-world tokenized securities worth hundreds of millions of euros being moved onto the chain. The migration of real assets is far more convincing than any white paper.
Amid a sea of boastful projects, Dusk remains somewhat quiet. It’s not rushing to revolutionize or promote disruption; instead, it’s diligently solving the most practical and challenging problem—how to truly combine finance and blockchain. This pragmatic attitude and long-term vision make me believe it has found a solid path. The next-generation financial infrastructure might look like this.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ponzi_poet
· 11h ago
Oops, Dusk's selective disclosure really has some substance. Finally, someone understands the pain points of financial institutions.
Zero-knowledge proof + compliance is indeed a more reliable combo than those projects that keep touting disruption every day.
The real asset on-chain worth hundreds of millions of euros at NPEX—that's what I want to see. Don't tell me about whitepapers.
Quiet projects often go the farthest. This saying is not an exaggeration.
Finally, we don't have to choose between privacy and compliance anymore. This is the way to break the deadlock.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 11h ago
Sounds beautiful, but I’ve heard this rhetoric many times before. Where are the projects from 2018 that claimed to "solve real problems" now?
Zero-knowledge proofs sound advanced, but how many can truly be practically implemented? The collaboration with that Dutch exchange, hundreds of millions of euros—just listen. How much real gold and silver is actually on-chain?
That said, this approach is indeed more reliable than most chaotic L2 solutions... better to observe a bit longer before taking action.
---
The combination of compliance + privacy—if financial institutions truly adopt this, the industry will have a future. The only concern is that it might just be an illusion.
---
I respect a pragmatic attitude, but until the ecosystem truly takes off, don’t hype it. My USDC is the best lesson.
---
Basically, it’s about making banks feel secure using blockchain, and that demand definitely exists. The question is how much real customer traction Dusk can attract in the future, not just storytelling.
---
Another "we are different"... The bear market has taught me not to believe that. Let’s wait until EVM runs stably for a year before talking.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 11h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs combined with selective disclosure are indeed powerful. Financial institutions can finally confidently put data on the blockchain.
Finally, there are projects that no longer need to shout slogans about disrupting the world; they focus on doing solid work.
The NPEX case is truly convincing; tokenizing securities worth hundreds of millions of euros is no small feat.
Are privacy and compliance necessarily opposed? Dusk's approach is indeed counterintuitive.
No matter how loud the hype, it's better to run real data; nowadays, few projects emphasize practical implementation.
Integrating both at the foundational level is the right architectural mindset, not just applying band-aids later.
Quiet projects are often the most formidable. Relying on actual results rather than marketing, I believe this approach is viable.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 11h ago
The zero-knowledge proof system is indeed impressive, but the key is to truly implement it... The operation involving hundreds of millions of euros at NPEX is what really matters to showcase.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 11h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good, but the key is whether they can really be implemented or just become PPT coins again.
Can compliance and privacy truly be perfectly integrated? Is it really that easy to fool regulatory authorities?
The NPEX transaction is a highlight, with hundreds of millions of euros on the chain. This is definitely not a joke.
Compared to projects that boast about revolutionizing the world every day, Dusk's low-key approach of quietly making money is much more refreshing.
Selective disclosure sounds impressive, but how to prevent certain links from being exploited? That’s the real test.
Reliable projects are rare; the question is whether the ecosystem can take off. Infrastructure without applications is just a waste.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 11h ago
Hey, finally there's a project that isn't just bragging. Can privacy and compliance really be integrated? Zero-knowledge proof technology has been around for a while, but the key is how this guy plans to use it. The selective disclosure design idea is truly brilliant. Hundreds of millions of euros in assets have actually been on-chain, not just talk. It gives me a good feeling.
When it comes to blockchain, many people get stuck on this dead end—either complete transparency or total privacy, and it seems there’s no third way. Transparency scares off financial institutions, while privacy angers regulators. The Dusk project happens to approach this problem from the opposite direction.
This is not a generic chain that tries to do everything. From the very beginning, Dusk has been clear about its mission: to build foundational infrastructure for the regulated financial world. The key is that it doesn’t treat privacy and compliance as two opposing concepts; instead, from the moment of its underlying architecture, it integrates both seamlessly.
The traditional approach is to first build the system and then attach compliance labels on top. Dusk’s approach is completely reversed—imagine a confidential channel with built-in checkpoints, where data in transit can hide details and protect trade secrets, yet still provide regulators with tamper-proof proofs. This is achieved using cutting-edge cryptographic tools like zero-knowledge proofs, but the real genius lies in the design of "selective disclosure." Sensitive parts of a transaction can be locked, while the parts that need verification are revealed.
What does this mean? Banks and asset management firms can conduct private transactions or issue assets on-chain, meeting audit and compliance requirements without any awkwardness. For those traditional players who have been watching blockchain from the sidelines, this instantly removes both psychological and technical barriers.
The ecosystem is also steadily advancing. The DuskEVM mainnet is already running, lowering the barrier for developers. More convincingly, it has partnered with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX—this is not just a proof of concept, but real-world tokenized securities worth hundreds of millions of euros being moved onto the chain. The migration of real assets is far more convincing than any white paper.
Amid a sea of boastful projects, Dusk remains somewhat quiet. It’s not rushing to revolutionize or promote disruption; instead, it’s diligently solving the most practical and challenging problem—how to truly combine finance and blockchain. This pragmatic attitude and long-term vision make me believe it has found a solid path. The next-generation financial infrastructure might look like this.