On the path of exploring how blockchain empowers finance, we often get stuck in a dilemma: on one side is DeFi's completely transparent logic, with transaction records fully visible; on the other side is the fully anonymous world of privacy coins, where regulation has no foothold. But for regulated institutions like banks and funds, neither path is feasible. What they truly need is to find that delicate balance point—"compliance auditing" and "business privacy"—that allows them to meet regulatory scrutiny while protecting client and transaction confidentiality.



Founded in 2018, Dusk Network is attempting to solve this problem. Rather than being a fixed product, it is better described as a modular toolkit—institutions can assemble their own blockchain solutions like building blocks, tailored to their needs.

**The Real Dilemma of Cross-Border Payments**

Imagine a scenario: a multinational bank needs to process large cross-border remittances. There are two main challenges. First, anti-money laundering (AML) audit requirements mandate that the bank must be able to prove the source and destination of funds to regulators—this is a hard bottom line. Second, the bank does not want competitors to see its fund flows and client lists. Combining these two needs, traditional blockchain architectures hit a wall.

With Dusk’s design, banks can build a private payment channel. The core technology is zero-knowledge proofs—simply put, it allows proving to regulators "I know certain information" without revealing that information itself. Transaction details are encrypted and protected; when regulatory nodes need to review, the bank can selectively disclose only the necessary metadata for verification. This "programmable privacy" capability makes compliance an inherent feature of the protocol itself, rather than an external constraint.

**New Opportunities in Real Asset Tokenization**

Another highly imaginative application is the on-chain tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). For example, a real estate investment fund might fragment a commercial building into tokens and sell them to investors worldwide. This scenario involves two major technical challenges.

First, privacy protection—investors’ identities and holdings must not be exposed. Who bought how much, and who doesn’t want others to know. If everything is transparent on-chain, investors would naturally resist. Second, tax compliance—different countries have vastly different tax laws. The US has its taxes, Europe has its own, and a global fund needs to automatically generate tax reports compliant with each jurisdiction. This is already complicated in traditional finance; without good tools, it becomes even messier on-chain.

Dusk’s modular approach can handle this complexity. By combining smart contracts and privacy protocols, the fund can implement on-chain: verified but undisclosed investor identities, encrypted holdings that can be authorized for querying, and automatic generation of country-specific tax documents. This approach satisfies global compliance while safeguarding participant privacy.

**Why This Matters**

Traditional financial institutions entering blockchain are not aiming for complete revolution. They want to leverage new technology within existing regulatory frameworks to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and expand possibilities. This represents a huge market opportunity—the daily flow of traditional financial assets globally is thousands of times larger than the cryptocurrency market.

This also explains why, in recent years, the integration of privacy technology with compliance design has become a key direction for Web3 infrastructure. Not all applications require full decentralization, nor do all need complete transparency. Many practical needs lie somewhere in between—requiring enough transparency to meet regulators, while maintaining sufficient privacy to protect commercial interests.
DUSK2,06%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 47m ago
Zero-knowledge proofs, to put it simply, are "I can prove I know but won't tell you." Banks love this because it can satisfy regulatory requirements while keeping things under wraps—pretty clever. Dusk's approach really hits the mark; a modular building block scheme is much more flexible than those all-or-nothing solutions. But when it comes to actual implementation, it might be another story. The combination of RWA tokenization and automated taxation sounds easy to say but hard to do... Tax authorities in different countries are not so easy to fool. Traditional finance is all about "regulations that can be checked and competitors that can't see," finding that balance is indeed difficult. But they have plenty of money to try, so let's watch the show. It seems that this is the true path for Web3—no need to push for complete decentralization. In reality, what’s needed is this kind of setup: "I comply but you can't benefit."
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 8h ago
Wow, zero-knowledge proofs are really amazing. The concept of programmable privacy is quite awesome.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 8h ago
Honestly, this is the right path for Web3. Don't just boast about complete decentralization every day. The traditional financial sector has a much larger slice of the cake. --- The set of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed clever. Regulatory authorities are satisfied, and business secrets are protected. You can have both fish and bear paws. --- I like Dusk's modular approach. It's much more practical than those all-or-nothing solutions. --- Tax issues on RWA are really troublesome... But automatically generating tax forms for different countries truly solves a pain point. --- You're right, privacy and compliance are not black and white. Real-world needs exist in the gray area. --- Finally, someone understands. Large institutions just don't want those kinds of ledgers to be public. Privacy coins are too extreme. --- This is what you call finding a balance. Between DeFi's transparency and privacy coins' anonymity, it's truly clever.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoadvip
· 8h ago
Honestly, this is the true direction where Web3 can be practically implemented. The set of zero-knowledge proofs sounds advanced, but it's actually just "I prove I know, but I don't tell you," which banks are most fond of. Compared to projects that claim to disrupt finance, Dusk's modular approach is actually more pragmatic. RWA+privacy+automatic tax reporting—this combination truly addresses pain points. It was previously stuck in a dead end of either full transparency or complete black box. But it still depends on major institutions actually using it to be meaningful; a perfect paper plan is useless. Honestly, this kind of work balancing regulation and privacy, if done well, is indeed a gold mine.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)