Many people look at Plasma and often fall into a misconception.
If you have to categorize it, saying it is a "new public chain" will most likely disappoint you. But look at it from another perspective—understanding it as a "financial infrastructure tailored for stablecoins" makes everything suddenly clear.
The real bottleneck of Plasma, frankly, isn't in the technology itself, but in its positioning and timing.
**The crypto world is repairing, Plasma is building the future**
Look at what the current public chains are busy with—faster matching speeds, lower interaction costs, more dazzling ecosystem applications, more exciting speculative opportunities. In essence, they are all self-optimizations within the crypto ecosystem.
And what about Plasma? It’s asking a different question: if stablecoins truly become the blood of the global financial system, what should the underlying architecture supporting them look like?
These are two completely different paths. One is internal competition, the other is preparing for the real world. No wonder many people feel nothing about it—because it wasn’t designed for the current you in the first place.
**Stablecoin scale is large, but payment scenarios are still a shell**
Some argue that the market cap of stablecoins proves how necessary Plasma is, but that’s a misjudgment.
What are the real uses of stablecoins today? Settlement in exchanges, arbitrage tools, collateral in DeFi, cross-platform liquidity. In essence, it’s still a cycle within the crypto world.
The real everyday consumption, inter-company payments, payroll, tax processing, supply chain settlements? These scenarios haven’t been activated by stablecoins yet.
Plasma is betting that these scenarios will eventually explode. The problem is, that shift hasn’t happened yet.
**0 Gas is not just about saving money, but about removing the "cryptocurrency" unfamiliarity**
Many think that no-gas fees are just a marketing gimmick to save money, but they miss the core. The true value lies in—when transaction costs approach zero, ordinary users no longer need to understand what Gas or fees are, and may not even realize they are using blockchain.
This is the prerequisite for large-scale adoption.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockchainiac
· 10h ago
Well said, Plasma is underrated, it's really just a matter of time.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 10h ago
Well said, but the reality is that stablecoins are still just hyping in the crypto world. The Plasma bet will have to wait until the Year of the Monkey or the Year of the Horse.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 10h ago
Basically, it's gambling on the future. It's normal that no one is buying into it right now.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 10h ago
That's right, most people in the crypto world are just spinning in a casino. Who the hell cares about real-world applications?
By the time stablecoins are truly used for daily consumption, Plasma will have already taken off. At that point, it'll be too late to regret.
The 0 gas fee aspect has indeed been underestimated. Ordinary people simply don't want to hear about blockchain; they just want to spend money peacefully.
Many people look at Plasma and often fall into a misconception.
If you have to categorize it, saying it is a "new public chain" will most likely disappoint you. But look at it from another perspective—understanding it as a "financial infrastructure tailored for stablecoins" makes everything suddenly clear.
The real bottleneck of Plasma, frankly, isn't in the technology itself, but in its positioning and timing.
**The crypto world is repairing, Plasma is building the future**
Look at what the current public chains are busy with—faster matching speeds, lower interaction costs, more dazzling ecosystem applications, more exciting speculative opportunities. In essence, they are all self-optimizations within the crypto ecosystem.
And what about Plasma? It’s asking a different question: if stablecoins truly become the blood of the global financial system, what should the underlying architecture supporting them look like?
These are two completely different paths. One is internal competition, the other is preparing for the real world. No wonder many people feel nothing about it—because it wasn’t designed for the current you in the first place.
**Stablecoin scale is large, but payment scenarios are still a shell**
Some argue that the market cap of stablecoins proves how necessary Plasma is, but that’s a misjudgment.
What are the real uses of stablecoins today? Settlement in exchanges, arbitrage tools, collateral in DeFi, cross-platform liquidity. In essence, it’s still a cycle within the crypto world.
The real everyday consumption, inter-company payments, payroll, tax processing, supply chain settlements? These scenarios haven’t been activated by stablecoins yet.
Plasma is betting that these scenarios will eventually explode. The problem is, that shift hasn’t happened yet.
**0 Gas is not just about saving money, but about removing the "cryptocurrency" unfamiliarity**
Many think that no-gas fees are just a marketing gimmick to save money, but they miss the core. The true value lies in—when transaction costs approach zero, ordinary users no longer need to understand what Gas or fees are, and may not even realize they are using blockchain.
This is the prerequisite for large-scale adoption.