a16z Crypto's recent statements have attracted industry attention, directly pointing out that DeFi protocols need a paradigm shift — no longer relying solely on the philosophy of "code is law," but moving towards a system where "standards are law."
There are real pain points behind this warning. Last year, the entire DeFi market suffered hack-related losses totaling $649 million (according to NS3 report data), involving major projects like Balancer. Numbers speak volumes: every million-dollar bug repeatedly confirms a truth — code audits alone are far from enough.
a16z Crypto recommends that all DeFi projects adopt standardized compliance check mechanisms, including invariant checks and runtime enforcement techniques. In simple terms, adding more self-protection logic at the code execution level to enable protocols to automatically identify and prevent abnormal behaviors.
This is not an empty suggestion. From a technical perspective, standard compliance checks are akin to installing "traffic lights" on smart contracts, capable of detecting issues before hackers exploit vulnerabilities. For development teams, this means reallocating security investments; for users, it provides an additional layer of protection.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropATM
· 16h ago
$649 million, that number makes my scalp tingle... Better lock up the hard drives a bit more.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 16h ago
$649 million worth of painful lessons. The saying "code is law" really needs to be reconsidered.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHunter
· 16h ago
ngl, $649M in losses and people still acting like code audits are sufficient... that's literally the definition of not learning from data. invariant checks sound nice on paper but let's be real, most devs won't actually implement this properly tbh
Reply0
SandwichDetector
· 16h ago
649 million USD lost, the "code is law" approach should have been changed long ago. It's a bit late to realize this now.
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperer
· 16h ago
$649 million gone, and they're still insisting that code is law. This logic is truly absurd.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 16h ago
Oh no, here we go again. The code is breaking the law.
Every time, we only think about adding protections after something goes wrong. Is paying 649 million USD in tuition worth it?
Regulatory checks sound very sophisticated, but do projects really take them seriously, or is it just another routine?
a16z Crypto's recent statements have attracted industry attention, directly pointing out that DeFi protocols need a paradigm shift — no longer relying solely on the philosophy of "code is law," but moving towards a system where "standards are law."
There are real pain points behind this warning. Last year, the entire DeFi market suffered hack-related losses totaling $649 million (according to NS3 report data), involving major projects like Balancer. Numbers speak volumes: every million-dollar bug repeatedly confirms a truth — code audits alone are far from enough.
a16z Crypto recommends that all DeFi projects adopt standardized compliance check mechanisms, including invariant checks and runtime enforcement techniques. In simple terms, adding more self-protection logic at the code execution level to enable protocols to automatically identify and prevent abnormal behaviors.
This is not an empty suggestion. From a technical perspective, standard compliance checks are akin to installing "traffic lights" on smart contracts, capable of detecting issues before hackers exploit vulnerabilities. For development teams, this means reallocating security investments; for users, it provides an additional layer of protection.