The expected value is still quite high, after all, this project claims to be making a big move this time. As a result, after completing the registration process, you still need to spend nearly $4 to participate in the airdrop. This logic is a bit confusing. Usually, we understand airdrops as free giveaways, but now you have to pay first to be eligible to receive? Reminding me of the experience with the last project, honestly, it was a bit frustrating. Hopefully, this time it won't crash, and the community won't be disappointed. This model of paying first and then receiving an airdrop definitely needs to be carefully considered from the user experience perspective.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Observer
· 9h ago
This is the classic "wool party trap." Analyzing from the source code level, it doesn't hold up—genuine airdrop incentive mechanisms shouldn't have hidden costs. There's a misconception here that needs clarification: the $4 "participation fee" essentially undermines the fairness of the initial token distribution and requires further verification to determine where this money has gone.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 9h ago
Coming back with this again? After registering, you still have to pay to receive it. This is a typical case of incentive distortion—ostensibly called airdrops, but in reality, a disguised way to harvest users' funds. To put it simply, it's just shifting the risk onto the users.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSage
· 9h ago
Here comes the same old trick of harvesting new investors, and calling a $4 airdrop?
The expected value is still quite high, after all, this project claims to be making a big move this time. As a result, after completing the registration process, you still need to spend nearly $4 to participate in the airdrop. This logic is a bit confusing. Usually, we understand airdrops as free giveaways, but now you have to pay first to be eligible to receive? Reminding me of the experience with the last project, honestly, it was a bit frustrating. Hopefully, this time it won't crash, and the community won't be disappointed. This model of paying first and then receiving an airdrop definitely needs to be carefully considered from the user experience perspective.