Stallion Portfolio Strategy: A 60/40 Split Breakdown
Here's how this diversified approach works:
**The Directional Component (60%)** This side is split down the middle: — Half goes into Mako Shark variant (using $TMF for leverage amplification instead of $TLT) — The other half flows into Great White Shark variant (deploying $SPXL for equity upside rather than $SPY)
Think of this as your aggressive positioning—designed to capitalize on clear market directional moves with tactical leverage built in.
**The Trend Component (40%)** This quarter is equally distributed across momentum-tracking strategies that smooth out the directional bets.
The overall effect? You're running a hybrid strategy that balances directional conviction with trend-following discipline. Directional traders get their leverage, trend followers get their timing buffer. It's a framework worth studying if you're building custom allocation models.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHermit
· 16h ago
NGL, this 60/40 split sounds pretty good, but can TMF and SPXL really hold up... Is the risk a bit too high?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 16h ago
60x leverage, 40x trend... This combo looks pretty good, just worried about losing composure during a drawdown.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 16h ago
I think the 60/40 ratio is still a bit aggressive... I've seen too many times where TMF and SPXL both get wiped out. By the way, can this framework really hold up in a bear market?
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 16h ago
The 60/40 allocation sounds good, but TMF and SPXL, these two leveraged tools, are really risky and depend on market temperament... However, on the other hand, the trend-following part can indeed help cushion the impact.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 16h ago
The 60/40 allocation looks good, but in practice, these two leveraged products TMF and SPXL are really hard to handle... When the market reverses suddenly, it explodes, and this "hybrid strategy" becomes pure gambling.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 17h ago
The 60/40 allocation sounds pretty good, but the question is, can the leverage hold up?
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 17h ago
Haha, 60/40 split and still using leverage... Isn't this just a gambler's setup? How do you control the risk?
Stallion Portfolio Strategy: A 60/40 Split Breakdown
Here's how this diversified approach works:
**The Directional Component (60%)**
This side is split down the middle:
— Half goes into Mako Shark variant (using $TMF for leverage amplification instead of $TLT)
— The other half flows into Great White Shark variant (deploying $SPXL for equity upside rather than $SPY)
Think of this as your aggressive positioning—designed to capitalize on clear market directional moves with tactical leverage built in.
**The Trend Component (40%)**
This quarter is equally distributed across momentum-tracking strategies that smooth out the directional bets.
The overall effect? You're running a hybrid strategy that balances directional conviction with trend-following discipline. Directional traders get their leverage, trend followers get their timing buffer. It's a framework worth studying if you're building custom allocation models.