XPL recently tested lows around $0.1138 before bouncing back—typical liquidity sweep that flushed out weak hands. The emotional selling proved temporary as price structure held firm.



Short-term technicals still point downside, but don't overlook what's developing underneath. The real support is coming from utility adoption: zero-fee stablecoin transactions and L1 infrastructure focus are establishing genuine demand floors beyond the chart noise.

When fundamentals start anchoring price action, that's when the noise matters less. XPL's building something—whether it sticks will depend on sustained adoption metrics more than the next swing low.
XPL-2,41%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DataPickledFishvip
· 5h ago
Using the old routine of weak hands, the dip to 0.1138 still depends on whether the subsequent adoption data can support it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58vip
· 14h ago
Sweeping the bottom really just clears out the newbies. What's that support at 0.1138...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 14h ago
The wash trading has been cleaned up quite well, and the weak hands really should come out now. But to be honest, the real story is in the zero-fee stablecoin sector.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAllvip
· 14h ago
It's the same old trick again, sweeping liquidity to shake out retail investors... However, zero-fee stablecoins are indeed interesting. If they can really gain volume, it will be a different story.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 14h ago
I saw through this liquidity sweep from the start; weak hands cutting losses is always the best opportunity to build positions.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 14h ago
ngl the zero-fee stablecoin angle is actually™ non-trivial if they can maintain throughput without sacrificing settlement finality... empirically speaking, most L1s fail at this exact tradeoff. curious whether their formal verification can hold up under real load conditions
Reply0
LightningHarvestervip
· 14h ago
It's just liquidity sweeping; weak hands should sell when they need to.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt