There is a phenomenon in the community that I find quite interesting—when discussing projects, people start comparing how many applications each has, as if this has become some kind of "competitiveness ranking." But if you think about it carefully, truly valuable financial assets wouldn't be placed on street vendor stalls, right? Of course not.

Today, let's talk about the Dusk project. Many people focus on its EVM compatibility, which is of course fine, but looking at it this way narrows the scope. What Dusk is really doing is embedding the entire framework of traditional finance—KYC, audit traceability, regulatory compliance—directly into the blockchain using cryptography. This isn't just simple "on-chain" data; it's more like giving financial transactions an invisible but indestructible armor.

Imagine this: when an accounts receivable is transferred on-chain, the transaction data is encrypted and private, but its compliance attributes and ownership can be clearly verified. For retail investors, this might be imperceptible, but for institutional investors? It’s like a lighthouse in the dark.

Will this system be too "heavy"? Will it affect transaction speed? That's also where Dusk puts effort. Its consensus design and privacy proof circuits are like precision servo systems, ensuring the entire mechanism runs both securely and smoothly. What's truly important isn't the peak TPS numbers on paper, but whether it can maintain stable proof generation times under actual load, and whether block confirmations are reliable. These seemingly minor "mechanical qualities" actually directly impact whether institutional clients will just try it out and withdraw, or truly dare to put long-term funds in. Recent technical upgrades have been continuously refining these details.