The core pain point of stablecoin payments is actually very simple: gas fees are too high, making small transactions not worthwhile. Especially in markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, where high-frequency small transactions are common, a few dollars in remittances are eaten up by gas fees, which is simply not feasible.



As a Layer 1 focused on stablecoin settlement, Plasma fundamentally solves this problem. It adopts a gas mechanism that prioritizes stablecoins, with almost zero fees when paying with USDT. Coupled with the sub-second PlasmaBFT consensus, transaction confirmation is extremely fast, completely transforming the on-chain payment experience.

What does the actual scenario look like? Overseas workers can send money home at zero cost, and merchants receiving USDT payments don’t have to worry about price fluctuations. Plasma has already established deep collaborations with payment service providers like Oobit, Rain Cards, and LocalPay, covering Visa networks and local QR code payments, with offline scenarios already deployed.

The most impressive feature is EVM compatibility. Based on the Reth execution layer design, existing wallets and applications can run directly on Plasma, so users don’t need to switch tools. Exchanges like Kraken and Cobo already support deposits and withdrawals, and Holyheld’s card products allow on-chain USDT to be used directly for card payments. Liquidity protocols like syrupUSDT and Aave have also integrated, enabling idle stablecoins to generate yields.

From a security perspective, Plasma uses a Bitcoin-pegged mechanism to strengthen network neutrality and resistance to censorship, avoiding the risks of a single consensus while maintaining high throughput.

The true goal is to bring stablecoins back to their essence as everyday currency, rather than just an investment asset. With more merchants and payment gateways joining by 2026, gasless transfers are expected to become a key driver in onboarding hundreds of millions of retail users onto the blockchain.
AAVE-2,18%
BTC-2,23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 1h ago
Gas fees are indeed a hurdle; half of a few-dollar transfer gets eaten up. Who can accept that? Zero-gas transfers sound great, but I don't know how it will actually perform once fully implemented. The Plasma solution sounds good, but execution is key... Looking forward to seeing the data. If workers can send money at zero cost, that would indeed be a significant improvement. EVM compatibility is a plus, saving the hassle of wallet development; ready-to-use solutions are available.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 10h ago
Gas fees directly eat up remittances, which is indeed a big problem. Sounds good, but how exactly can we ensure zero gas stability? Has it really been used in Southeast Asia? Or is it just another PPT project? EVM compatibility definitely saves effort; just use existing wallets. 2026? That's a bit far. We need to prove it can run now. Stablecoin payments have always been just talk. Can Plasma break the deadlock?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 11h ago
Remittances of a few dollars are eaten up by gas fees, and this is the real wall preventing a large number of people from going on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyervip
· 11h ago
Remittances of just a few dollars are losing half to gas fees, which is truly outrageous. How many people in Southeast Asia have given up on on-chain payments because of this?
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 11h ago
The gas fees are so outrageous that it's really not feasible for daily use. The Plasma approach is indeed correct.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 11h ago
According to the tokenomics model in the white paper, the stablecoin-prioritized gas mechanism theoretically indeed solves the problem of incentive incompatibility. However, it is worth noting that whether the actual adoption rate can meet expectations depends on the efficiency of implementing governance proposals.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpavip
· 11h ago
ngl, the "zero gas for stablecoins" pitch hits different when you actually do the math on remittance corridors... but let's be honest, we've heard this sustainability story before, right?
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)