2026-01-19 23:45:58

Trove actually makes way more sense building on Solana. The throughput, cost structure, and user base alignment just hit different compared to Hyperliquid. People sleeping on this ecosystem fit honestly. The technical architecture matters way more than hype.

SOL-0,75%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnruggableChad

· 6h ago

The Solana ecosystem is really underestimated; Trove made the right move. The cost and throughput are crushing, but no one is paying attention.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 6h ago

The SOL ecosystem has indeed been somewhat underestimated. Moving Trove over might bring about something different.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 6h ago

The Solana ecosystem is indeed often underestimated, but can Trove really thrive more comfortably here? The costs are indeed low, but is the ecosystem depth sufficient?

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 6h ago

Looking at the Solana ecosystem, it's really refreshing, and gas fees are truly not an issue. The folks at Hyperliquid sometimes just hype up concepts; if Trove really gets it up and running, maybe they can come up with something.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 6h ago

Solana has less cost pressure over there. Is no one really paying attention to this... Hyperliquid's hype has gone too far.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 6h ago

The Solana ecosystem has indeed been seriously underestimated. Trove's move was very clever.

View OriginalReply0

ShamedApeSeller

· 6h ago

The Solana ecosystem has indeed been seriously undervalued. Compared to projects that rely on hype, Trove's underlying technology is truly its core competitive advantage.

View OriginalReply0