BlockSec monitoring data shows that the SynapLogic contract recently suffered a hacker attack, resulting in approximately $186,000 in funds lost.



The main function of this contract is to proportionally distribute the native token SYP's revenue share to users. The root cause of the issue lies in a serious parameter validation flaw in the code— the system did not perform effective validation of the total distribution amount when allocating tokens, failing to ensure that the distribution amount did not exceed the actual amount paid to the contract (msg.value).

The attacker exploited this vulnerability by carefully constructing specific recipient address configurations. Through this method, they caused the contract to distribute native tokens far exceeding the actual received amount, achieving a fund siphoning. During the entire process, the attacker realized profit by cashing out the newly minted SYP tokens.

This incident serves as a reminder to developers that in contract design involving token distribution and value transfer, parameter validation and boundary checks must be rigorous. Any logical loophole could become an attacker's entry point.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PretendingToReadDocsvip
· 8h ago
It's the same old problem again. If parameter validation isn't done properly, you're just waiting to be exploited. $186,000 is gone just like that.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossipervip
· 8h ago
Another sloppy job of parameter validation... $186,000 just lost like that. Do the SYP developers still have the nerve to call themselves developers?
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 8h ago
Once again, parameter validation was not done properly. These types of vulnerabilities have been appearing quite frequently over the past two years. SYP was exploited again. Developers need to learn their lesson this time. 18.6 million gone, and they didn't even validate msg.value—really outrageous. It's always these basic bugs. Is audit really just a formality? Such a fundamental allocation logic can still have bugs. Laughable. It's the old trick of insufficient boundary checks again. The hacker's tactics this time are quite old. How come some people still fall for it? It seems these kinds of contract vulnerabilities are impossible to prevent; everyone reacts only after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtistvip
· 8h ago
Once again, parameter validation was not properly done... Such basic mistakes are still happening repeatedly. Developers really need to be more careful.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt