Perpetual Contract Protocol TroveMarkets exposed issues right after launch. The project completed fundraising with a valuation of $20 million FDV, which sounds pretty good, but its performance after going live was shocking—only an additional $500,000 in liquidity.
What’s more concerning is the token distribution. The project team released about 15 million TROVE tokens all at once. The result? A large number of new wallets received between 5 million and 10 million tokens, then immediately sold them off. Single transactions ranged from $30,000 to $84,000, with no hesitation.
This pattern closely resembles early project fundraising tactics: high valuation fundraising → liquidity shortage → token oversupply → quick cash-out. On-chain analyst Specter bluntly stated that Trove has a tendency to become a project similar to "2026" (note: incomplete in the original). In other words, this is likely another cautionary example of a liquidity trap and token distribution imbalance. For participants, this is a risk signal worth paying attention to.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterLucky
· 4h ago
It's the same old trick again. Overhyped meme coins are really nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 9h ago
Another scheme to fleece retail investors has been exposed, this time even the concealment was too lazy to hide.
Trove is such a terrible project, dumping 15 million tokens all at once, with a new wallet cashing out instantly. Isn't this just the project team promoting themselves?
500,000 in liquidity... LOL. Is this "operation" or "escape"?
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 9h ago
Another typical move by a big project, copying with overestimated valuation is really pointless
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 9h ago
I'm too familiar with this routine, it's another script for overvalued projects to fleece retail investors... 500,000 in liquidity? That's hilarious, this is just a honey pot.
Oh my God, Trove has used all the tricks this time, connecting a new wallet to dump coins immediately—who would catch it here?
Again with this? Overvalued valuation, low liquidity + over-issued tokens, the classic "raise funds first, then run" combo.
Honestly, projects these days don't even bother pretending... it looks just like a fishing scheme, waiting for newcomers to rush in.
Why do people still dare to leverage on such projects? I really don't understand.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 9h ago
Again with the same tricks, overestimating valuation to enter, liquidity turning into a complete mess, tokens dumping. Trove's move is really top-notch, raising $20 million but only leaving $500,000 in liquidity—almost asking "How do you want to die?"
---
150 million tokens released all at once, new wallets instantly turn into cash-out machines. Isn't this just openly scamming retail investors?
---
Honestly, we've seen through these kinds of projects so many times. It's nothing but hype about valuation, launching at dump prices, and token holders racing to escape. Specter is right; it's definitely a liquidity trap.
---
Really, every time such a project launches, the first question should be: Where's the liquidity? How outrageous is the token distribution? Just these two data points can determine life or death.
---
If Trove's move can be called creative, the only creativity is in "how to make investors go bankrupt the fastest."
---
For those still thinking about participating in such projects, you really are brave.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick again: overvalued financing, liquidity drying up, tokens crashing down all at once, then big players turn around and run. I'll try this smart trap first.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 10h ago
It's the same old trick again, raised 20 million with a valuation, launched with 500,000 liquidity, hilarious.
Trove's token distribution is outrageous, 15 million tokens dumped all at once, new wallets get them and run. I just want to ask, who the hell would take the bait?
This is the daily life of Web3—high valuation → liquidity desert → token dump, old tricks.
Basically, it's a honey pot, waiting for retail investors to get caught.
How are there still people willing to touch such projects? Specter is right, this is a prelude to the tragedy of 2026.
Perpetual Contract Protocol TroveMarkets exposed issues right after launch. The project completed fundraising with a valuation of $20 million FDV, which sounds pretty good, but its performance after going live was shocking—only an additional $500,000 in liquidity.
What’s more concerning is the token distribution. The project team released about 15 million TROVE tokens all at once. The result? A large number of new wallets received between 5 million and 10 million tokens, then immediately sold them off. Single transactions ranged from $30,000 to $84,000, with no hesitation.
This pattern closely resembles early project fundraising tactics: high valuation fundraising → liquidity shortage → token oversupply → quick cash-out. On-chain analyst Specter bluntly stated that Trove has a tendency to become a project similar to "2026" (note: incomplete in the original). In other words, this is likely another cautionary example of a liquidity trap and token distribution imbalance. For participants, this is a risk signal worth paying attention to.