2026-01-20 07:24:35

Developers buy back with royalties? That logic is a bit convoluted. Clearly, as the project founder, and having had comment records on GitHub, there should be a more direct way.

To be honest, I find this operation a bit confusing. But since he's positioned at this price level, I've decided to add to my position here.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 9h ago

The term "royalty buyback" seems to be trying to hide something. Just say it directly, and it's done.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 01-20 07:53

Wait a minute, I need to think more about the royalty buyback logic... I feel like I've been played again.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-20 07:51

Follow the trend and add to your position? Fine, since everything's already a mess, I'll play along with you.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 01-20 07:50

The rhetoric about royalty buybacks... feels like beating around the bush. Isn't it more complicated to buy directly?

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-20 07:46

The rhetoric about royalty buybacks is truly outrageous, feels like something is being covered up.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-20 07:38

Following the trend to add positions? I think you're just betting he won't run away, haha.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-20 07:34

Following the trend to buy the dip, anyway, if he's willing to spend money, I dare to follow.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecovery

· 01-20 07:33

ngl, the whole "developer buyback via royalties" angle screams classic obfuscation pattern. if dude's actually the founder with github receipts, why the roundabout theater? we've seen this architectural flaw before—inevitable collapse incoming fr

Reply0