NPM's recent decline is indeed quite heartbreaking, and there are several possibilities worth considering.
First, could it be that the project team's accounts encountered risks? Although this situation is rare, it is not impossible.
Second, perhaps the project team and the project itself have diverged, with early promises deviating from reality, leading to a loss of community popularity and being entangled in many FUD.
There's also a less pleasant but necessary possibility—if team members secretly dumped their holdings after laying out their chips in advance, such internal sell-offs have been seen quite often in the crypto world.
The specific cause can only be determined by on-chain data. Large position changes, counterparties' directions, transfer records—these hard indicators often reveal some truths. This is also why investors are increasingly paying attention to on-chain analysis—data doesn't lie.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractExplorer
· 8h ago
Another wave of internal dumping? Continuously selling so much, just by looking at the counterparties' directions, you can pretty much guess it right.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 8h ago
Internal dump, I bet five dollars. This trick has been played out in the crypto circle.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 9h ago
On-chain data analysis reveals who is dumping; no need to guess blindly.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 9h ago
Pull up the on-chain data and you'll immediately know if it's a rug pull—don't just listen to FUD.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 9h ago
It's the same trick again; just by checking on-chain data, you can see who's pretending.
NPM's recent decline is indeed quite heartbreaking, and there are several possibilities worth considering.
First, could it be that the project team's accounts encountered risks? Although this situation is rare, it is not impossible.
Second, perhaps the project team and the project itself have diverged, with early promises deviating from reality, leading to a loss of community popularity and being entangled in many FUD.
There's also a less pleasant but necessary possibility—if team members secretly dumped their holdings after laying out their chips in advance, such internal sell-offs have been seen quite often in the crypto world.
The specific cause can only be determined by on-chain data. Large position changes, counterparties' directions, transfer records—these hard indicators often reveal some truths. This is also why investors are increasingly paying attention to on-chain analysis—data doesn't lie.