One of history's most celebrated investors once challenged our obsession with the bottom line. You'd think someone who's mastered wealth accumulation would preach its virtues—but here's the twist: he's spent decades arguing it's actually a terrible yardstick for measuring a life well-lived.
His take? Money without real relationships isn't success at all. Strip away the portfolio, the accolades, the zeros in the bank account, and what remains? If it's just empty space, then what was the point?
That perspective might seem counterintuitive in a world where we obsessively track gains and losses. But it hits differently when it comes from someone who genuinely could have optimized purely for wealth. Instead, he's consistently positioned genuine human connection as the actual currency that matters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_huntress
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but when it comes to the moment of harvesting in the crypto world, how many people are still thinking about connections rather than the zero in their wallet?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 8h ago
Well said, this is the truth. Our group spends every day watching candlestick charts, chasing gains and losses, only to find that our accounts are full but our hearts are empty. It's funny, isn't it?
Money is just waste paper if no one is there to spend it with. I truly believe that now.
This guy has a clear understanding of life, much better than us self-proclaimed smart leeks. Haha.
It doesn't matter; the most important thing is whether there are people around you who can have fun together.
Although I say this, I still keep working hard on my coins... Ah, forget it.
I've seen too many people become lonely after sudden wealth; money can't fill that void at all.
This kind of motivational quote is getting a bit tiresome, but it really hits the point.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 8h ago
That's right, but when these words come from a billionaire's mouth, it's a bit... how should I put it, a sense of late realization, haha.
Only after having a lot of money do you understand what emptiness really means; we've understood that long ago.
That's what they say, but in the end, you still have to make money. No matter how good the relationship is, you still need to eat, right?
In the Web3 circle, everything is lacking except for this kind of reflection on "money theory." But what about actual actions?
I'll leave it at that. This guy's realization is still a bit late.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 8h ago
That's very true, but the problem is that most people can't listen.
One of history's most celebrated investors once challenged our obsession with the bottom line. You'd think someone who's mastered wealth accumulation would preach its virtues—but here's the twist: he's spent decades arguing it's actually a terrible yardstick for measuring a life well-lived.
His take? Money without real relationships isn't success at all. Strip away the portfolio, the accolades, the zeros in the bank account, and what remains? If it's just empty space, then what was the point?
That perspective might seem counterintuitive in a world where we obsessively track gains and losses. But it hits differently when it comes from someone who genuinely could have optimized purely for wealth. Instead, he's consistently positioned genuine human connection as the actual currency that matters.