2026-01-21 07:37:09

There is indeed an interesting phenomenon in the BSC ecosystem—those token names with slightly more complex letter combinations tend to get stuck in the system. Some users have complained that even basic combinations like abc can be reversed, let alone tokens with special arrangements. This reflects not only technical limitations but also the clash of different user group needs—foreign developers want flexible naming spaces, while the chain's rules are somewhat restrictive. Sometimes one side says yes, and the other says no, and this contradiction can indeed give cross-border project teams a headache.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashRateHustler

· 4h ago

Laughing to death, even ABC can be reversed? How flawed is the BSC system --- It's the same old story domestically and internationally, really annoying --- Namespace blocking is really a pain, wasting so much time --- Cross-border projects are just difficult, no one wants to compromise --- That's why some coins can never get listed on mainstream exchanges --- Rigid system settings, developers want innovation, it's a deadlock --- Damn, even the coin name gets blocked, how conservative is the chain over there --- It's caused by rule conflicts, nothing surprising --- Can't even handle something as basic as alphabet arrangement? Ridiculous --- Cross-chain interoperability issues still stem from the underlying technology

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 12h ago

Damn, this bug is really outrageous, can even ABC be reversed? --- It's the classic problem of clash between Eastern and Western standards. --- So, the biggest fear for cross-chain projects is these inexplicable restrictions. --- No wonder so many projects prefer not to touch BSC even on Ethereum. --- Isn't this just a lack of thorough consideration in system design? Typical. --- Foreign developers must be fed up. When will there be a unified standard? --- It feels like the BSC ecosystem is just like this, full of pitfalls. --- Haha, really, sometimes I think this chain is just a big experimental field. --- Isn't this just the cost of centralization? I've said it before.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 12h ago

Haha, BSC is just like that. Naming this trivial matter can cause all sorts of trouble. --- If I had known that naming would be so tricky, I would have avoided the pitfalls. Anyone would be annoyed. --- Isn't this just a clash between domestic and international rules? It's totally normal. --- Wait, even ABC can be mixed up? Are you sure this isn't an isolated case? --- Cross-border project teams really do have it tough. Who asked you to choose BSC? --- So, only tough guys use BSC deeply, really. --- Who can solve these conflicts? Wait for the rules to be updated? --- The coin names are already ridiculous enough, can they be simpler? --- I just want to know when the official will fix this issue. --- There are indeed many pitfalls with BSC, but there's nothing we can do.

View OriginalReply0

BlindBoxVictim

· 12h ago

Haha, the BSC system is really hardcore, mainly due to the administrators' overprotection. That's why I always choose simple English names when trading cryptocurrencies, to avoid hassle. Just from the naming issues alone, you can see that cross-chain projects are really challenging. Honestly, if even abc can be reverse-engineered? Who would trust this system?

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 12h ago

Haha, this bug is really awesome, it can even reverse abc --- This is the characteristic of BSC, who made its rules so capricious --- The same problem with domestic chains, developers have to look at the chain's face --- The blood, sweat, and tears of cross-border project teams, one system, one set of rules, so annoying --- So you still need to find a reliable chain, don't get stuck on these small issues --- Rules and requirements are always at odds, it's always the same set --- Why are namespace restrictions so strict? Honestly, it's unnecessary --- BSC's system should have been optimized a long time ago --- It seems you have to deliberately step into a pit to learn how to name tokens --- Bro, this is why I moved to other chains

View OriginalReply0

WhaleStalker

· 12h ago

The naming rules of this chain are really terrible, I don't understand why they are so rigid. Even ABC can be reversed? LOL, how embarrassing. BSC's mess should have been fixed long ago; just shouting about technical limitations is pointless. Multinational project teams suffer; who can accept one standard on one side and a different one on the other? System stuck on coin names? Might as well not use BSC at all. When will these petty disputes be resolved? It's really a waste of time. Developers want to name freely but end up getting screwed; who should be blamed?

View OriginalReply0