2026-01-21 09:10:30

Bhutan becomes a validator on the Sei network. This news may seem simple, but it actually contains deeper implications. On the surface, some may jokingly call it "Buddhist-style mining" or a small country riding the coattails of popularity, but from a different perspective, it reflects a strategic game at the sovereignty level—the competition over who will build the next-generation settlement infrastructure.

When a country actively participates in a blockchain validation network, it is essentially laying out its future digital finance landscape. As a high-performance public chain, the security and distribution of power within Sei's validator network directly relate to the trustworthiness of on-chain assets and settlement efficiency. When a country like Bhutan joins, it is not only an endorsement of the public chain ecosystem but also a declaration: we recognize this chain's potential as the foundational platform for future value transfer.

The significance of this form of participation is far more profound than mere "mining rewards." It indicates that blockchain infrastructure is evolving from a purely technical level to a national strategic level, with all parties vying for participation rights and influence.

SEI-0,64%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

faded_wojak.eth

· 3h ago

This move by Bhutan is really clever. Small countries also understand how to secure their future settlement rights.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 01-21 19:18

Is Bhutan really playing? It turns out sovereign countries are now starting to compete for public chain validators. This grand chess game is quite intense.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-21 09:40

I didn't expect Bhutan to make this move, but upon reflection, it's indeed ruthless... To put it simply, it's about seizing the right to speak; whoever controls the validators controls the future. Really, don't be fooled by the words "mining"; it's essentially a matter of geopolitics. Small countries are actually more willing to take risks, with fewer burdens. Wait, does this mean we should also consider this...

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-21 09:29

Bhutan's recent moves are indeed interesting; on the surface, they seem Zen-like, but in reality, they are deeply strategic. But to put it simply, it's about vying for influence—everyone wants a seat at the table. Can Sei truly sustain this situation? I'm a bit worried. National-level participation has indeed changed the game rules, not just about mining. Brilliant, small countries actually see things more clearly than big countries. What sounds like a strategy is actually gambling... small countries have lower costs. This is the real way to overtake on a bend—smart.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-21 09:23

Bhutan's move is truly brilliant; it seems Zen-like but is actually playing a grand game.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-21 09:18

Wait, I need to dig into the wallet flow of Bhutan's verification node... According to on-chain data, the source of these funds is a bit subtle. Obvious fund connections suggest that it's definitely not as simple as it appears on the surface. Several suspicious addresses have already been locked. Is Bhutan truly making autonomous decisions, or is someone pulling the strings behind the scenes? Only through multi-address tracking can the truth be revealed. This buy and sell, it feels like a typical wash token scheme... Changing the entity's name for verification disperses the weight. The fundamental question is, who approved Sei's side? Where are the on-chain voting records? Why is it so low-key?

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-21 09:15

Bhutan's move to establish validators is indeed interesting, but to be honest, it's still a gamble on whether SEI can survive. I've seen many small countries follow the trend of major cryptocurrencies. Speaking of which, if this truly becomes a national-level infrastructure, what say do we retail investors have... Is anyone worried about the concentration of validator power? That's the real hidden danger. Bhutan's recent actions seem to be more about political propaganda. The idea of "zen" mining is just a side note; the key point is they want to show they're keeping up with the times. Wait, if countries all rush to secure validator positions, could it actually lead to more centralization of public blockchains? That's a bit ironic. SEI probably doesn't have many applications yet, so increasing the number of validators won't make much difference. Joining as a small country = endorsement? I think it's most likely a short-term financing tactic—don't overthink it. The analysis of the fight for ownership and influence is good, but reality might be even harsher than we imagine... Bhutan is truly a living Bodhisattva, bringing warmth to SEI.

View OriginalReply0