What’s Happening in Washington Now • Ongoing Negotiations but No Agreement Yet The White House has hosted multiple meetings bringing together banking groups and crypto industry leaders to negotiate how stablecoin yields should be treated under U.S. law. Despite progress in discussion tone, no final deal has been reached yet. Banks and crypto firms still disagree on whether stablecoin yields should be allowed and under what rules. • Central Issue: Stablecoin Yield Structure The core sticking point is whether stablecoin rewards — such as interest or yield offered on stablecoin balances — should be allowed, and if so, how they are regulated. Traditional banks argue that unrestricted yields could compete unfairly with bank deposits, while the crypto side says some form of yield is essential to market competitiveness. • Broader Policy Context: CLARITY Act Delays These stablecoin yield disagreements are holding up progress on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act — a key piece of U.S. crypto market structure legislation. The White House has even set target deadlines (like March 1) for a compromise so that the bill can move forward in Congress. • White House Role Becoming More Active Reports suggest the White House is now directly steering these talks, pushing both sides toward a workable framework rather than leaving negotiations entirely to industry stakeholders. This shows the issue has moved from informal discussion to a central policy priority. Why This Matters for Crypto Markets • Regulatory Clarity Could Boost Stability A clear law on stablecoin yields would reduce uncertainty for issuers, platforms, and investors. It should help bridge traditional banking and crypto services without regulatory ambiguity. • Bank vs Crypto Interests Remain Divergent Banks want strict limits or bans on yield to protect deposit franchises, while crypto advocates want enough flexibility to innovate. How this impasse resolves will shape the future of stablecoin products in the U.S. • Delays Could Slow Legislative Momentum If a deal isn’t reached soon, broader crypto regulation — including market structure rules — could be stalled, affecting investment, product launches, and institutional participation in the crypto sector. In short, the White House stablecoin yield talks are progressing but remain unresolved. The outcome will have major implications for how stablecoins operate alongside traditional financial products and could determine the pace of U.S. crypto regulatory reform going forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
12
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Korean_Girl
· 3h ago
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
Luna_Star
· 8h ago
LFG 🔥
Reply0
HighAmbition
· 11h ago
Year of the horse Wealth Score
Reply0
repanzal
· 14h ago
2026 GOGOGO 👊
Reply0
ShainingMoon
· 17h ago
LFG 🔥
Reply0
ShainingMoon
· 17h ago
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
MasterChuTheOldDemonMasterChu
· 17h ago
Wishing you great wealth in the Year of the Horse 🐴
#WhiteHouseTalksStablecoinYields
What’s Happening in Washington Now
• Ongoing Negotiations but No Agreement Yet
The White House has hosted multiple meetings bringing together banking groups and crypto industry leaders to negotiate how stablecoin yields should be treated under U.S. law. Despite progress in discussion tone, no final deal has been reached yet. Banks and crypto firms still disagree on whether stablecoin yields should be allowed and under what rules.
• Central Issue: Stablecoin Yield Structure
The core sticking point is whether stablecoin rewards — such as interest or yield offered on stablecoin balances — should be allowed, and if so, how they are regulated. Traditional banks argue that unrestricted yields could compete unfairly with bank deposits, while the crypto side says some form of yield is essential to market competitiveness.
• Broader Policy Context: CLARITY Act Delays
These stablecoin yield disagreements are holding up progress on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act — a key piece of U.S. crypto market structure legislation. The White House has even set target deadlines (like March 1) for a compromise so that the bill can move forward in Congress.
• White House Role Becoming More Active
Reports suggest the White House is now directly steering these talks, pushing both sides toward a workable framework rather than leaving negotiations entirely to industry stakeholders. This shows the issue has moved from informal discussion to a central policy priority.
Why This Matters for Crypto Markets
• Regulatory Clarity Could Boost Stability
A clear law on stablecoin yields would reduce uncertainty for issuers, platforms, and investors. It should help bridge traditional banking and crypto services without regulatory ambiguity.
• Bank vs Crypto Interests Remain Divergent
Banks want strict limits or bans on yield to protect deposit franchises, while crypto advocates want enough flexibility to innovate. How this impasse resolves will shape the future of stablecoin products in the U.S.
• Delays Could Slow Legislative Momentum
If a deal isn’t reached soon, broader crypto regulation — including market structure rules — could be stalled, affecting investment, product launches, and institutional participation in the crypto sector.
In short, the White House stablecoin yield talks are progressing but remain unresolved. The outcome will have major implications for how stablecoins operate alongside traditional financial products and could determine the pace of U.S. crypto regulatory reform going forward.