The world of investing has never lacked for different schools of thought. Some advocate for Duan Yongping's "no need to see everything at a glance" — over-predicting the future often backfires, and it's better to follow the trend and adjust gradually. On the other end, Warren Buffett firmly states: "If you're not willing to hold a stock for ten years, don't even think about ten minutes." These are two completely different philosophies of holding assets. One emphasizes flexible iteration, the other emphasizes long-term conviction. Between them, there are other schools — some excel at swing trading, some are obsessed with long-term holding, some bet on emerging sectors, and others stick to value fundamentals. Which approach is superior? Perhaps the answer lies in understanding the logical basis of each philosophy, then choosing based on your risk tolerance and time horizon. Blindly following any school of thought is the most dangerous investment decision.