What Are the Main Security Risks and Vulnerabilities in PLEB Token Trading?

Market Sentiment Volatility: PLEB Token Experiences 37.20% Value Decline in 30 Days Due to Negative News Events

The PLEB token market has demonstrated significant bearish sentiment throughout the latter months of 2025, characterized by substantial price deterioration. Market analysis reveals a stark decline of 37.20% over the past 30 days, driven predominantly by negative news events that have eroded investor confidence. This downturn reflects broader market concerns regarding the token's fundamentals and utility within the Base ecosystem.

Current market indicators paint a concerning picture for PLEB holders. The RSI readings on the weekly timeframe stand at 0.00, indicating extremely oversold conditions that suggest further downward pressure may continue. Price forecasts compiled by market analysts project an additional 25.08% decline by December 27, 2025, potentially reaching approximately $0.000043 per token.

The token's market capitalization has contracted substantially, with circulating supply dynamics failing to provide sufficient support. Trading volume remains relatively constrained at approximately $47,986 over 24 hours, suggesting limited liquidity and reduced market participation. These metrics collectively indicate that institutional and retail investors have substantially reduced their exposure to PLEB, reflecting diminished confidence in the asset's near-term recovery prospects.

Centralized Exchange Custody Risks: Dependency on Trading Platforms Like Gate and Bitget for Asset Security

When storing PLEB or any cryptocurrency on centralized exchanges like Gate and Bitget, users face substantial custody risks that fundamentally differ from self-hosted wallet management. These platforms operate as custodians, meaning users surrender control of their private keys to the exchange, creating significant counterparty risk.

The custody model presents multiple vulnerabilities. Security breaches pose direct threats, with historical incidents demonstrating how centralized platforms become targets for sophisticated attacks. Users lack transparency into reserve holdings and security practices, despite initiatives like Proof of Reserves seeking to rebuild confidence.

Regulatory changes compound these risks substantially. Government actions can restrict or freeze user access regardless of platform security quality. Exchange insolvency or operational failures create additional exposure that users cannot mitigate through platform choice alone.

To minimize custody dependency, investors should maintain only trading liquidity on exchanges while holding long-term PLEB positions in self-controlled, non-custodial wallets. This approach reduces exposure to exchange-related risks while maintaining operational control over assets through decentralized alternatives.

Price Manipulation and Liquidity Risks: Extreme Price Fluctuations Creating Potential for Significant Investor Losses

PLEB token experienced dramatic market volatility in 2025, with price fluctuations reaching 343.75% within 24 hours, demonstrating the acute risks inherent in emerging cryptocurrency markets. The token's development team scrapped critical liquidity provision plans in mid-November after identifying serious concerns regarding potential price manipulation and investor loss risks.

The fundamental challenge stems from PLEB's market structure, featuring extremely low trading volume of approximately $47,986 daily against a total supply of 1 billion tokens. This liquidity constraint creates conditions where even moderate trading activity can trigger severe price swings, exposing retail investors to substantial losses.

Market participants observed that the abandoned liquidity initiative, initially considered a protective measure, revealed underlying structural vulnerabilities. The token's trading concentration across only five active market pairs amplifies manipulation risks, as coordinated trading activity can disproportionately influence price discovery mechanisms.

Such volatility patterns correlate with broader market concerns about concentrated token supplies and speculative dynamics. Investors face significant exposure to sudden price reversals, particularly in low-liquidity environments where exit opportunities become constrained during market stress. The PLEB case demonstrates how delayed or canceled protective measures can signal deepening market confidence issues among project stakeholders.