Why Buffett's Boring Index Fund Bet Crushed Wall Street Pros

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Buffett has a simple playbook: buy S&P 500 index funds and hold. Sounds boring? That’s the point.

Back in 2008, he wagered $500K against hedge funds that his Vanguard S&P 500 ETF would outperform. Nine years later, he won by a landslide—the fund returned 126% while the best hedge fund managed only 88%, despite charging way higher fees.

Why does this matter? The S&P 500 has compounded at 10.3% annually over 30 years (1,820% total return). That’s a universe of 500 major U.S. companies—Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon—plus global exposure. And the expense ratio? Just 0.03%.

Here’s the math that’ll make you sweat:

  • $450/month invested → $87K after 10 years
  • Same amount → $320K after 20 years
  • Same amount → $940K after 30 years

The kicker: Professional investors consistently fail to beat this simple index over long periods. Yet they charge you 1-2% fees to try. Buffett’s message is clear—most investors shouldn’t be chasing individual stocks or paying fund managers. Just buy VOO, reinvest dividends, and let compound interest do the heavy lifting.

That’s not sexy. But it works.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)