2025-12-30 10:25:47

Last year's market call turned out pretty solid—government backing signals were credible enough to bet on, and the stock market delivered. Sure, things got messy in early months with all that volatility, but once September hit, a solid 15-month bull run kicked in. Sometimes the macro picture really does matter when you're positioning your portfolio.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanPrince

· 2h ago

Well, relying on policy signals still requires some finesse; the key is to hit the right timing.

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 2h ago

Knowing the policy trend early would have been enough; the September wave really wasn't a waste of time.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 2h ago

If I had known the policy was so powerful earlier, I would have bet everything. Now I regret not getting on board even more aggressively.

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 2h ago

Government endorsement really works well; I've been optimistic about this logic for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 2h ago

ngl, the macro signals were basically readable on-chain if you knew where to look—government backing is just a consensus mechanism in disguise, and the market priced it in eventually. the volatility part though? that's where most people's risk models broke down. wonder if anyone actually stress-tested their portfolios against september's inflection point or just got lucky with timing.

Reply0

LayerHopper