Do you think that the lowest birth rate in history can scare the emperor? Actually, whether you have children or not, the cake was never meant to be divided with you. So your decision not to have children is not a bargaining chip, just a personal stop-loss. Do you think that lying flat and not working like a beast will make the emperor stop working? In fact, whether you lie flat or not, the means of production are not in your hands. So lying flat is more like self-protection rather than resistance. Do you think that complaining a couple of times can influence the overall situation? In reality, your complaints only circulate within your small circle. Your anger is turned into content by the platform, then into traffic, ultimately neither changing reality nor benefiting yourself. Societal demands that lack the possibility of "losing control" are usually ignored indefinitely. You're not playing a game; you're just living on the chessboard. Throughout history, the only way that truly forces structural concessions has almost always been a form that requires three conditions to be met simultaneously: high organization, genuine risk tolerance, and the creation of significant instability costs. It's not that no one thought of that path, but the accounts of that path have long been calculated clearly.