Omimi

We’ve spent too long relying on a handful of companies to lend us their processing power.
Watching @inference_labs, it’s clear that on-chain intelligence is the "exit strategy" we’ve been waiting for.
It’s about creating a system where the hardware is distributed and the intelligence is permissionless.
The evolution is happening in real-time, and it’s much more than just hype.
Do you think the big players are even aware of how fast this is moving?

The tech stack for @0xMiden is fascinating because it treats the user’s device as a first-class citizen.
In most setups, your device is just a window to the network.
With Miden, your device is the actual processor.
You run the contracts, you generate the proof, and you only send the essentials to the chain.
No more waiting for validators to re-process your logic. It’s snappy, private, and honestly, how things should have been from the start.
What’s the first thing you’d build if you didn’t have to worry about validator congestion?

@emmaz33k Good night

What’s interesting about the Crucible isn't just the tech, it’s the incentives.
By gamifying LLM calibration, @inference_labs is basically crowdsourcing the fix for AI overconfidence.
I’m curious to see if Season 2 introduces more "penalty" mechanics for agents that follow the herd.
In my opinion, the most valuable agents are the ones that go against the grain and end up being right.
That’s true intelligence.

You’ve got two paths today:
1. Keep using AI that might be lying to your face (and losing you money).
2. Switch to @inference_labs where every result is verified and 100% proven.
I know which one I’m picking. Verifiable AI is a must. Which side are you on:
Blind Trust or Mathematical Proof? 👇

Allowing other protocols to build their own resolvers under the @0xMiden umbrella is smart.
Instead of every dApp trying to launch a mediocre ".app" name, they can just use Miden’s infrastructure to create custom, functional identities.
It’s basically "Identity-as-a-Service" rather than just a registry.