傳統金融市場有個經典說法：買股票就是買公司。

但真相呢？你手裏那張股票憑證，公司真把你當股東看嗎？😏

現實很骨感——股票和公司之間隔着一堵牆，那堵牆叫「股東大會」。散戶手裏那點票，根本影響不了公司決策。所以聰明錢都去選那些「換誰當老板都能躺贏」的公司，但凡碰上個強勢CEO，基本就別想了。

這就是爲什麼RWB會比RWA更有想象力。

RWB模式下，像RoamFi這類項目直接打通了現金流和資產代幣之間的壁壘。你持有的不只是一張「投資憑證」，而是和業務收益綁定的真實權益。

簡單說：RWA是把真實資產代幣化，RWB是把真實業務代幣化。前者你買的是資產映射，後者你買的是業務增長本身。

當然，這不是投資建議。任何決策前記得DYOR(Do Your Own Research)。

———

**ENG:**

There's a classic saying in traditional finance: buying stocks means buying the company.

But here's the reality — does the company actually recognize you as an owner? 😏

There's a wall between your stock certificate and the company, and that wall is called the "shareholders' meeting." Retail investors hold so few shares that they can't influence corporate decisions at all. That's why smart money targets companies that "run smoothly no matter who's in charge." If there's a strong CEO? Forget it.

This is exactly why RWB has more potential than RWA.

Under the RWB model, projects like RoamFi eliminate the gap between cash flow generation and the business token itself. What you hold isn't just an "investment certificate" — it's real equity tied directly to business revenue.

In short: RWA tokenizes real-world assets. RWB tokenizes real-world businesses. The former gives you an asset proxy; the latter gives you the business growth itself.

Of course, this isn't financial advice. Always DYOR before making any decisions.