🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Tether vs Circle: Contrasting Approaches to Stablecoin Freeze Policies
Source: CryptoNewsNet Original Title: Stablecoin Giant Tether Deals Major Blow to Illegal Activities! Millions of Dollars Frozen! Here Are the Details Original Link: https://cryptonews.net/news/security/32187677/ Stablecoin issuers Tether and Circle have implemented freeze policies against crypto assets linked to illicit activities, with results becoming apparent between 2023 and 2025.
According to the report, Tether blocked approximately $3.3 billion worth of crypto assets through its freeze mechanism during this period, while Circle’s total frozen amount remained at $109 million. These figures show a significant difference of approximately 30 times between the two companies.
Based on AMLBot data, Tether blacklisted 7,268 addresses during this period. More than 2,800 of these were blacklisted as part of operations conducted in coordination with US law enforcement.
The company aimed to return some funds linked to fraud and criminal proceeds to victims by removing them from the system through its “freeze + burn + re-issue” model. More than 53% of the frozen USDT assets were held on the Tron network.
Circle, by contrast, is taking a more cautious approach. The company has only frozen 372 addresses, totaling $109 million. Circle emphasized that these actions are carried out solely in accordance with court orders or regulatory directives, and that it does not resort to burning or re-issuing the frozen tokens.
Experts note that this differing approach between the two companies demonstrates the adoption of different strategies regarding regulatory compliance and crime prevention within the stablecoin ecosystem. Such practices are expected to become even more important in the coming period with increased oversight.