🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Something's been bugging me about how market algorithms work. Silver sat in the $40-60 range for ages—barely a whisper from the usual channels. Then the moment it crosses $70, suddenly everyone's algorithm starts screaming about it. Why the delayed push? Why now?
Here's what really grinds my gears: nobody called the Bitcoin top at 126k. Not a single legitimate call. Yet now that silver has moved, the hot takes are everywhere claiming it's peaked at $70. They act like they saw it coming. This reeks of that classic media play—visibility only after the move, then claiming they knew all along.
The data doesn't support these "top" narratives. Bitcoin moves without consensus. Silver? Could easily push higher from here. The real question isn't whether $70 is the ceiling—it's why the algorithm stayed silent when smart money was probably already positioning in the $40-60 zone. That's the inefficiency worth studying.