Year-end is here, and many people are debating a question: should I withdraw my USDT for the New Year, or put it into exchange financial products to earn interest? I heard some financial products can offer an annualized return of 20%, which is indeed tempting.



This matter needs to be looked at separately. First, it’s important to understand whether the RMB has been appreciating throughout this year, and if so, whether it’s appropriate to convert to RMB (settle foreign exchange) now. Second, if we use RMB for calculations, how much return from exchange financial products is needed to offset the loss from the relative depreciation of the dollar.

Some mention the Japanese yen appreciation and the subsequent "Lost 30 Years," but it’s not that simple. Don’t be misled by interpretations from certain social media outlets.

In theory, yen appreciation is good—it strengthens purchasing power and is suitable for consumption-driven economies. But Japan at that time, like us, relied on foreign trade. After the yen appreciated rapidly, assets denominated in yen soared, hot money flooded into the stock market, then flowed overseas. As a result, Japan’s attempt to shift from an export-driven to a consumption-driven economy failed, and the economy stagnated.

Our current situation is a bit different. The RMB has appreciated, and purchasing power has strengthened as well, but our trade surplus remains. This means that domestically produced goods can absorb excess purchasing power, allowing a smoother transition to a consumption-based economy.

Specifically, the RMB has appreciated about 4% this year. It might be roughly the same next year until the domestic circulation truly kicks in.

What does this mean? If you keep your funds in exchange financial products or other investment products, and their annualized return is less than 4%, it basically can’t offset the loss from dollar depreciation. The market is indeed sluggish now, and some platforms offer financial products with yields reaching this level. Although there are limits (for example, a maximum of 50,000), the transaction costs between USDT and financial products are actually not that significant. If the quota is sufficient, these types of financial products are worth considering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenEconomistvip
· 2h ago
actually, the key variable here is whether ur calculating real returns in rmb or nominal usd terms... think of it this way: if usd depreciation outpaces ur apy, u're basically hodling a depreciating asset ceteris paribus. but yeah the japan comparison is kinda flawed lol, totally different macro conditions
Reply0
ChainMaskedRidervip
· 2h ago
Zhaiyu nested doll set, with an annualized return starting at 4% to avoid losses. To put it simply, it can't outpace the appreciation of the RMB.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForevervip
· 3h ago
4% can't be broken, I still need to find higher yields.
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keysvip
· 3h ago
Wow, is a 4% threshold this low? Then I need to see which platforms can still offer this yield now...
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 3h ago
Wait, can a 4% return really beat inflation? I feel like this logic is a bit of a stretch...
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrendervip
· 3h ago
It looks like a math problem. The 4% threshold is quite clear; anything below that is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDayvip
· 3h ago
To be honest, the 4% threshold is a bit low; truly reliable products have already been snapped up.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)