🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
In the wave of the intention economy, a question has been posed to everyone—will technological progress make us dumber?
The answer might be surprising. We no longer need to drill wood for fire, nor can we calculate square roots. Every tool revolution has freed humanity from repetitive labor. As long as we can verify the results, the black-box process isn't actually that scary—this could even be called a form of "happy regression."
But with the rise of the Solver mechanism, new concerns have emerged. Scale effects naturally lead to Solver centralization, which contradicts our goal of a decentralized world. However, technology always finds a way out. Projects adopting ZKP solutions are exploring a new path: centralized executors must submit mathematical proofs for each operation. Execution is centralized, but verification remains decentralized—that's likely what the future will look like.
An even more urgent issue is privacy. Imagine shouting on the street, "I want to buy 10 million Bitcoins," and the next second, you're targeted—that's the logic behind MEV attacks. Some projects are experimenting with a clever approach: combining FHE and TEE technologies to match user intentions in encrypted form. The Solver can see that an order exists but doesn't know who initiated it, until the transaction is completed.
Of course, there's a technical challenge ahead—what if AI misunderstands the intent? This is known as the "alignment problem." Some solutions have come up with an idea: before the user signs, the wallet pops up a simulation of the result. Is this your intention? Asset A will become Asset B, with a fee of about 0.1%. Confirm or cancel? Users can see a preview before officially submitting, greatly reducing risks.
These innovations may still be young, but they are gradually solving the core problems of the intention economy era.