2025-12-30 00:26:37

In the cycle from 2026 to 2028, the prediction market and on-chain brokerages are both generally viewed as having the greatest potential. Although the former faces compliance challenges, solutions will always be found. Currently, it is still in the early stage of wild growth, and the market space has not yet been fully unleashed. In comparison, the logic of on-chain brokerages is more complex, and the difficulty level is higher — there is no mature prototype visible yet, and the entire track is still in the exploration stage. From a development perspective, the prediction market has at least a clear evolutionary direction, while the path for on-chain brokerages is much more ambiguous. In comparison, the former is indeed more likely to break through first.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldFarmRefugee

· 16h ago

Prediction markets are indeed clearer now, and compliance issues will be resolved sooner or later. It all depends on who can seize the market share first. On-chain brokerages... to be honest, it's still a foggy area, and I haven't seen any particularly convincing products emerge. Wait, do these two tracks compete with each other? Or are they complementary? This cycle might truly belong to prediction markets, but I still favor projects that dare to innovate. However, compliance is easier to say than to do. How much cost does it really take to implement? On-chain brokerages sound high-end, but I doubt most people actually need such complex systems. After prediction markets become popular, will there be another round of rug pulls?

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 16h ago

prediction markets are basically just betting with extra steps but ok, the infrastructure narrative is getting tired ngl... on-chain brokers tho? that's where the real protocol design challenges live, most people just don't understand the complexity yet

Reply0

GateUser-addcaaf7

· 16h ago

Prediction markets do have potential, but the compliance issues will eventually need to be addressed, or else it will be Schrödinger's wealth explosion. On-chain brokerages sound nice, but in reality, they are still stumbling in the dark, and no one truly understands. Wait, can these two tracks really become popular between 2026-2028? I always feel like it's just another round of hype around concepts. Prediction markets are just gambling with a different name, but maybe they can really come up with some innovative approaches. Honestly, on-chain brokerages are too confused right now; it might be better to go all-in on prediction market targets. By the way, should we also ask how prediction markets view this kind of forecast? The era of wild growth for prediction markets might really be coming, but brokerages still have to wait and see. Compliance can't stop it; in the end, everyone will have to find a way out. Making on-chain brokerages successful is a big deal, but the probability of prediction markets being implemented first is actually higher.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 16h ago

Predictive markets are indeed more down-to-earth, but on-chain brokerages are still in the fog.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster69

· 16h ago

Predictive markets are indeed more transparent, while on-chain brokerages are still in the dark. This gap is obvious at a glance.

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 16h ago

The prediction market is indeed promising this time, and compliance is just a matter of time. On-chain brokerage? After all this effort, it's still a vague concept. This track needs to wait a bit longer.

View OriginalReply0