2025-12-30 04:10:31

#数字资产市场动态 Will Bitcoin reach a new high again in 2026?

2025 has been a rollercoaster. Changes in the macro environment, fluctuating liquidity, and continuous new highs in the market have kept things exciting, but there’s also been plenty of market noise. $BTC once surged to $126,000, and the driving forces behind this are worth pondering.

From a fundamental perspective, the restart of quantitative easing, ongoing institutional capital inflows, the scarcity expectations during the Bitcoin halving cycle, and shifts in policy direction have all contributed to digital assets entering a new phase of value discovery. 📈

What might the outlook be for next year? There are some similarities in the market environment — regulatory frameworks may loosen, economic stimulus measures could be introduced, monetary policy cycles are shifting, and retail participation is rising. These conditions seem to echo the situation during the pandemic in 2020.

If liquidity truly recovers and policy expectations stabilize, assets like $BTC might experience another explosive surge. 💥

BTC-2.35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FudVaccinator

· 2h ago

126,000 still needs to push higher, or how can we call it a new high? --- I missed the wave in 2020, and this time I will die on BTC. --- Liquidity warming up? Let’s see what the Federal Reserve says first; words are empty. --- Institutions are hoarding coins, retail investors are still debating whether it will fall or not, hilarious. --- I’ve heard the halving cycle logic three times; will next year really be different? --- Policy shifts can turn good news into bad news in an instant; who dares to go all in? --- Can the conditions from that pandemic wave be replicated? Economic data are all different. --- Explosive growth? I just want to make steady money without big ups and downs. --- The expectation of easing depends on Europe and the US; they are the true masters. --- After all this talk, the old saying still applies: managing risks well is the most important.

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 3h ago

$126,000? Bro, wake up. It's already $130,000 now. Your article is outdated. Heard the halving cycle explanation too many times. Can it really keep rising? Flow is warming up, huh? Every time you say that, the market starts to crash. I'm tired of seeing it. During the pandemic in 2020, who didn't make money? The problem is, can it be replicated now? You're overthinking it a bit. Retail participation is increasing... Isn't that a sign of a market top? Buy opposite, everyone. Whether loose policies are reliable or not, I don't know. I only know the next crash will cause losses again. The idea of institutional inflows is heard every bull market, but in the end, the fastest to run are still the institutions.

View OriginalReply0

SelfCustodyIssues

· 3h ago

$126,000 is just the appetizer, the real show is next year Is it a replay of 2020? Don't joke around, this time it will be even more intense Liquidity warming up can lead to a surge? I don't believe you Halving cycle + loose policies, this setup does have some potential Retail investors have been cut so many times again this year, dare they get in next year? Easing regulatory frameworks, how easy is that? Don't be too optimistic, brother Explosive growth? Wake up, survive the bear market first Institutions are quietly accumulating chips, and we're still here discussing nonsense Liquidity comes and goes, unreliable New all-time highs keep being broken, but my wallet has never kept up

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 3h ago

Already surpassed $126,000, is there really anything worth waiting for? Just go for it.

View OriginalReply0

DefiOldTrickster

· 3h ago

Ha, it's that same rhetoric from 2020 repeating again. I got hammered in the re-investment strategy back then, and hearing this now still makes me want to laugh. $126,000? Wait, how should the liquidation price be set to make sense then?

View OriginalReply0