2025-12-30 05:01:54

Lighter's recent major moves are worth paying attention to. They are launching their own ecosystem token LIT, which will be directly issued by a US C-Corp to align incentive distribution within the ecosystem.

How to understand this logic? Simply put, the revenue from DEX and future fees generated by other products will be on-chain and traceable, then flexibly allocated based on market conditions—either to support ecosystem growth or to buy back tokens. This design approach is mainly aimed at creating real value for token holders in the long term.

Regarding token distribution, 50% is allocated to ecosystem development, while the team and investors each hold 25%, making it relatively balanced. The goal for the 2025 points season is to distribute a total of 1250 incentive units. This design tightly binds the interests of participants and project parties, which is a common governance approach in Web3 projects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RealYieldWizard

· 2h ago

Lighter's recent moves are pretty good, and the 50% distribution ratio of the ecosystem seems quite thoughtful. Does anyone really care about the buyback logic, or is it just for concept hype? 1250 units of incentives? Will it turn into just another air coin story in the next quarter?

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 2h ago

Sounds reliable. I'm quite optimistic about the 50% allocation for ecosystem development.

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 2h ago

Hey, wait, issuing a US C-Corp? This tactic is pretty interesting, what are they trying to avoid? The ecosystem accounts for 50%... feels okay, just depends on whether the team is genuinely committed.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 2h ago

It's all about tokens and incentives, but how many can actually be implemented? Looking at Lighter's approach, they talk a good game about 50% ecosystem development, but the key is how they execute it moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 2h ago

Wait, 50% for the ecosystem? The allocation still seems a bit generous to the team... But the buyback mechanism is pretty well done, at least it's not just a pure rug pull scheme.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 2h ago

Lighter's gameplay this time is pretty good, and the setup where the C-Corp directly issues tokens is quite interesting... We'll have to see if it truly goes on-chain and becomes traceable later on. I've heard a lot about the buyback logic, but the key still depends on whether there is genuine revenue supporting the floor. The 50/50 split seems quite fair, but how the ecosystem construction half is allocated is what really matters. 1250 units sound like a lot, but how is this number base calculated? Without some reference, it feels a bit vague. The idea of incentivizing through binding interests is something every project talks about, but the ones that need to run still end up running as usual.

View OriginalReply0