That $22M in fees heading to cash-outs? Here's the thing—it should fuel buybacks instead. Real talk: accumulating capital for growth doesn't mean dumping it the moment you can. You either build or you bail. The community's got a point here: strategic capital deployment through repurchases signals conviction, not just extraction. Growth mode requires a different mindset altogether.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MercilessHalalvip
· 2h ago
22M should be used for buyback, selling this set makes me sick to my stomach
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 2h ago
Buybacks are indeed much more reliable than direct withdrawals... but the figure of 22M still hurts a bit.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 2h ago
Buyback or withdrawal, this is the test of faith. True builders won't back down at critical moments.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodievip
· 2h ago
bruh $22M for withdrawal fees? that's like charging michelin prices for frozen dinner vibes. if they're actually redeploying for buybacks instead of just kitchen-dumping capital, that's actually the farm-to-fork strategy we've been screaming for 🍽️
Reply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 2h ago
Such a large amount of money isn't used for buybacks but instead withdrawn? I'm truly speechless. The community still has to teach you how to play.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)