2025-12-30 20:23:11

Last quarter, the valuation methods for creator tokens began to become more professionalized. Several emerging valuation frameworks are worth noting—such as the SAP model (Social Asset Pricing) proposed by the Forefront team. This system incorporates community activity, content quality, and actual economic contributions into the pricing logic. Meanwhile, Rally uses liquidity bond curves to address price discovery for token launches, and Roll influences the initial issuance price of tokens through social credit scores. These approaches are quite innovative.

From a data perspective, the average market capitalization of the top 100 social tokens has seen significant growth—from $3 million to $8 million. However, to be honest, the volatility of these tokens remains quite fierce, typically 2 to 3 times that of traditional creator stocks, so the risks are indeed present.

Interestingly, institutional players are starting to pay attention to this track. Many market makers and liquidity management teams are beginning to offer professional services for creator tokens, indicating that the market is gradually maturing and becoming more regulated.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 10h ago

Volatility 2 to 3 times? That's like playing Russian roulette. Who really dares to go all in on creator tokens? Institutions are entering, but it feels like they might kill this thing. Is there still creativity left? The SAP model sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be all talk and no action. This wave of price increase doesn't seem very solid; it feels like it might drop. The ideas behind Rally and Roll are indeed interesting, but the real test has yet to come. From 3 million to 8 million, it looks attractive, but who bears the risk? Professionalization = just making the tool for cutting leeks more convenient. There are many valuation frameworks for tokens, but the key is to have real users. Without that, it's all virtual. When institutions come in, they start to regulate. Does that mean the freedom of creators will be taken away?

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 10h ago

Bro, the SAP model sounds pretty good, but with volatility 2-3 times higher? Are you still daring to play? Institutional entry is interesting, indicating that someone is finally taking this seriously. The top 100 tokens grew from 3 million to 8 million, not bad but not that exaggerated either. Liquidity bond curve + credit scoring—does this combination still seem a bit risky? The real profit probably still comes from those early birds. This wave of specialization is a good thing, but it depends on whether institutions truly want to do long-term or just come in to make a quick profit and then run.

View OriginalReply0

DefiOldTrickster

· 10h ago

Haha, SAP models, bond curves, credit ratings... sound fancy, but it's actually just playing the liquidity arbitrage game. I was thinking about this stuff 10 years ago before Ethereum even came out. To put it simply, it's about whether you can make a living off volatility—2 to 3 times the volatility? Is this inviting me to buy the dip or sell the top? The most interesting part of institutional entry is, what does it mean when market makers come in? It means someone is about to get chopped up. I don't mean anything else by it, but this track is finally gaining some popularity, otherwise there's nowhere to put the annualized returns.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 10h ago

Hmm, the SAP model sounds good, but I'm more concerned about how well the permission control of these contracts is implemented. Does the liquidity bond curve solve price discovery? It depends on whether the code has hidden integer overflow risks. Institutional entry is indeed a signal, but don't forget—the DeFi boom in 2020 saw many so-called "professional" liquidity schemes end up failing. Are audits up to date?

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 10h ago

Another new framework to cut leeks? SAP, liquidity bond curves... sound professional but still the same old story. Volatility 2-3 times? Come on, that's just gambling. Why dress it up as creator economy? Institutional entry is the real danger signal. When they come in, retail investors have to take the fall.

View OriginalReply0