2025-12-30 20:29:58

A major compliance platform just announced the listing of LIT mainnet token. But here's the catch—LIT on mainnet still hasn't established proper connectivity with the Lighter ecosystem.

That's not even the main issue. Lighter's withdrawal service has been experiencing downtime for hours now, with no clear timeline for resolution. For market makers, this creates a genuinely thorny problem: How do you facilitate liquidity and arbitrage when the technical infrastructure isn't fully operational?

The token is live on a major exchange, but the bridge between the two protocols remains broken. Add a withdrawal outage on top of that, and you've got a situation where the usual market mechanisms can't function as intended. It's worth watching how this plays out—especially for anyone planning to provide liquidity across these venues.

LIT-44.04%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayerZeroHero

· 10h ago

Is it still playable if the Shanghai Stock Exchange is down? Bridge is also broken, and there are issues with withdrawals. This show is really too surreal. This operation is really... the token isn't even ready yet and you're rushing to launch? Am I right or not? Why is it always like this? Fast launch, slow fixes. How painful must it be for market makers? Wait, isn't this just another old trick of "we've already realized the problem"? It's just copying homework, with infrastructure so rotten yet still having the nerve to say the ecosystem is mature. So are the people who enter now just cannon fodder? This rhythm... I suspect someone is deliberately doing it.

View OriginalReply0

NFTDreamer

· 10h ago

Going live and failing immediately, this move is really something else. The bridge wasn't even properly connected, and you're in such a rush to list on the exchange—aren't you just shooting yourself in the foot? Withdrawal still stuck, I just want to know who dares to be a market maker at this time... This LIT combo punch completely confused people. Wait, how long has the withdrawal been pending? Is no one managing this? By the way, in situations like this, does anyone still dare to leverage? I wouldn't touch it.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 10h ago

Typical case of listing first and fixing bugs later, this move is truly impressive --- Wait, you're still lying down to withdraw coins and daring to list on an exchange? Who gave you the courage? --- Bridge broke, and withdrawals are also broken. How is this liquidity supposed to work... --- Listing a semi-finished token on a compliant platform, this statement is a bit ironic --- How awkward must market makers be now... funds can come in but can't go out --- NGL, this timing is really disappointing. Can't you stabilize the infrastructure first before bragging? --- It's that old routine again, step one listing, step two fixing bugs --- Withdrawal is broken and you still want liquidity? Dream on

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 10h ago

Typical opening with a poor start, the infrastructure wasn't set up properly before listing on the exchange. I really can't believe this operation. Withdrawal issues, cross-chain problems, market makers must be suffering a lot, this trading is impossible. LIT launches quickly, problems come even faster. Who dares to add liquidity at this time? Bridge exploded, withdrawals also failed. And they still dare to ride the wave of compliance platform hype? Wait, isn't this just the routine operation of some projects... First hype it up, then fix the problems slowly. Retail investors are always the last to know. Endorsed by a compliant platform, but infrastructure is inadequate. This bad review should have been written long ago. I really want to know how the team planned this. The time lag is ridiculously off. No, if the withdrawal service is down, can it still be called a "major listing"? They're playing with fire.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 10h ago

What kind of thing is this? They dare to issue a coin without even fixing the infrastructure. This must be a common operation by VC. Wait, is the withdrawal still down? Who dares to be a market maker? Truly impressive. Another classic "launch first, fix later" masterpiece... They rushed to the exchange before completing the infrastructure, which will definitely lead to chaos later. Are these people brainless? They still have a broken bridge and expect users to provide liquidity. It sounds like a project routine that starts blaming others after a successful fundraising.

View OriginalReply0